Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591994›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2020

5 km front crawl in pool and open water swimming: breath-by-breath energy expenditure and kinematic analysis.

Rodrigo Zacca, Vânia Neves, Tiago da Silva Oliveira, Susana Soares, Luís Manuel Pinto Lopes Rama, Flávio Antônio de Souza Castro, João Paulo Vilas-Boas, David B Pyne, Ricardo J Fernandes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stroking Rates of Open Water Swimmers during the 2019 FINA World Swimming Championships.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rodrigo ZaccaCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. rzacca@fade.up.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-0000
Vânia NevesCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Tiago da Silva OliveiraCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Susana SoaresCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Luís Manuel Pinto Lopes RamaFaculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-8618
Flávio Antônio de Souza CastroSchool of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Dance, Aquatic Sports Research Group (GPEA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0848-8226
João Paulo Vilas-BoasCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4109-2939
David B PyneThe University of Canberra Research Institute for Sport and Exercise (UCRISE), Canberra, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1555-5079
Ricardo J FernandesCentre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-0443
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Canberra · AUUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreath-by-breath energy expenditure during open water swimming has not yet been explored in an ecological environment. This study aimed to investigate and compare energetics and kinematics of 5 km swimming, in both swimming pool and open water conditions.

methodsThrough four independent studies, oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]

resultsIn the swimming pool, swimmers started with an above average swimming speed (v), losing efficiency along the 5 km, despite apparent homeostasis for [La

conclusionsSmall fluctuations were observed for energetic variables in both conditions, but changes in C were lower in swimming pool than in open water. Coaches should adjust the training plan accordingly to the specificity of open water swimming.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAthletic PerformanceEnergy MetabolismFemaleGlucoseHeart RateHumansKineticsLactic AcidMaleOxygen ConsumptionRespirationSwimmingWaterYoung AdultGlucoseLactic AcidWaterEnergeticsHuman locomotionOpen waterOxygen uptake kineticsSwimming

Identifiers

PMID32591994
OpenAlexW3037658588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.