Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591958›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Changes in corticospinal excitability during bilateral and unilateral lower-limb force control tasks.

Akiko Yamaguchi, Atsushi Sasaki, Yohei Masugi, Matija Milosevic, Kimitaka Nakazawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Akiko YamaguchiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.
Atsushi SasakiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.
Yohei MasugiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan.
Matija MilosevicDepartment of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyama-cho, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-1850
Kimitaka NakazawaDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan. nakazawa@idaten.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-8659
The University of Tokyo · JPJapan Society for the Promotion of Science · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JP) JPMJCR14E4Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17F17733Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18H04082Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18KK0272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankle dorsiflexion force control is essential for performing daily living activities. However, the involvement of the corticospinal pathway during different ankle dorsiflexion tasks is not well understood. The objective of this study was to compare the corticospinal excitability during: (1) unilateral and bilateral; and (2) ballistic and tonic ankle dorsiflexion force control. Fifteen healthy young adults (age: 25.2 ± 2.8 years) participated in this study. Participants performed unilateral and bilateral isometric ankle dorsiflexion force-control tasks, which required matching a visual target (10% of maximal effort) as quickly and precisely as possible during ballistic and tonic contractions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the primary motor cortex to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right tibialis anterior during: (i) pre-contraction phase; (ii) ascending contraction phase; (iii) plateau phase (tonic tasks only); and (iv) resting phase (control). Peak-to-peak MEP amplitude was computed to compare the corticospinal excitability during each experimental condition. MEP amplitudes significantly increased during unilateral contraction compared to bilateral contraction in the pre-contraction phase. There were no significant differences in the MEP amplitudes between the ballistic tasks and tonic tasks in any parts of the contraction phase. Although different strategies are required during ballistic and tonic contractions, the extent of corticospinal involvement appears to be similar. This could be because both tasks enhance the preparation for precise force control. Furthermore, our results suggest that unilateral muscle contractions may largely facilitate the central nervous system during movement preparation for unilateral force control compared to bilateral muscle contractions.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorPyramidal TractsAdultElectromyographyHumansMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultAnkle dorsiflexionBilateralCorticospinal excitabilityForce controlTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)Unilateral

Identifiers

PMID32591958
OpenAlexW3037897827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.