Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591927›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2020

Recursive music elucidates neural mechanisms supporting the generation and detection of melodic hierarchies.

Mauricio J D Martins, Florian Ph S Fischmeister, Bruno Gingras, Roberta Bianco, Estela Puig-Waldmueller, Arno Villringer, W Tecumseh Fitch, Roland Beisteiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The hearing hippocampus.Progress in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mauricio J D MartinsBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. mmartins@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0247-8473
Florian Ph S FischmeisterInstitute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Bruno GingrasInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Roberta BiancoUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Estela Puig-WaldmuellerDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Arno VillringerBerlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
W Tecumseh FitchDepartment of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roland BeisteinerDepartment of Neurology, High-Field MR Center of Excellence, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

European Research Council 230604Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/64206/2009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to generate complex hierarchical structures is a crucial component of human cognition which can be expressed in the musical domain in the form of hierarchical melodic relations. The neural underpinnings of this ability have been investigated by comparing the perception of well-formed melodies with unexpected sequences of tones. However, these contrasts do not target specifically the representation of rules generating hierarchical structure. Here, we present a novel paradigm in which identical melodic sequences are generated in four steps, according to three different rules: The Recursive rule, generating new hierarchical levels at each step; The Iterative rule, adding tones within a fixed hierarchical level without generating new levels; and a control rule that simply repeats the third step. Using fMRI, we compared brain activity across these rules when participants are imagining the fourth step after listening to the third (generation phase), and when participants listened to a fourth step (test sound phase), either well-formed or a violation. We found that, in comparison with Repetition and Iteration, imagining the fourth step using the Recursive rule activated the superior temporal gyrus (STG). During the test sound phase, we found fronto-temporo-parietal activity and hippocampal de-activation when processing violations, but no differences between rules. STG activation during the generation phase suggests that generating new hierarchical levels from previous steps might rely on retrieving appropriate melodic hierarchy schemas. Previous findings highlighting the role of hippocampus and inferior frontal gyrus may reflect processing of unexpected melodic sequences, rather than hierarchy generation per se.

Indexed as

MusicAdultAuditory PerceptionBrainBrain MappingCognitionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultHierarchyHippocampusIFGMusicRecursionSTG

Identifiers

PMID32591927
PMCPMC7473971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.