Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591897›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Urinary tract infection and antibiotic use around ureteral stent insertion for urolithiasis.

Bérénice Souhail, Patrick Charlot, Gilles Deroudilhe, Yves Coblentz, Gregory Pierquet, Pierre Gimel, Nathalie Challut, Thierry Levent, Stéphane Cusumano, Véronique Dautezac and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Therapeutic failures of targeted antibiotic prophylaxis in urology.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bérénice SouhailRéso-Infectio-PACA-Est, Nice, France. souhail.b@chu-nice.fr.
Patrick CharlotElsan, Clinique Inkermann, 84 Rte d'Aiffres, 79000, Niort, France.
Gilles DeroudilheElsan, Clinique Saint Augustin, 114 Ave d'Arès, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Yves CoblentzElsan, Clinique Inkermann, 84 Rte d'Aiffres, 79000, Niort, France.
Gregory PierquetElsan, Clinique Saint Augustin, 114 Ave d'Arès, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
Pierre GimelElsan, Clinique Saint-Roch 5 Rue Ambroise Croizat, 66330, Cabestany, France.
Nathalie ChallutElsan, Clinique Saint-Roch 5 Rue Ambroise Croizat, 66330, Cabestany, France.
Thierry LeventElsan, Clinique Vauban, 10 Avenue Vauban, 59300, Valenciennes, France.
Stéphane CusumanoElsan, Clinique du Sidobre, Chemin de St Hyppolyte, 81100, Castres, France.
Véronique DautezacElsan, Clinique du Sidobre, Chemin de St Hyppolyte, 81100, Castres, France.
Pierre-Marie RogerRéso-Infectio-PACA-Est, Nice, France.
Centre Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur · FRClinique Ambroise Paré · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urolithiasis is the main indication for a ureteral JJ stent. Our aim was to determine the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) after a JJ stent for urolithiasis, with an emphasis on antibiotic use. Prospective, multicenter, cohort study over a 4-month period including all of the patients with urolithiasis requiring JJ stent insertion. The clinical and microbiological data and therapeutic information were recorded until removal of the JJ stent. Two hundred twenty-three patients at five French private hospitals were included. A urine culture was performed for 187 patients (84%) prior to insertion of a JJ stent, 36 (19%) of which were positive. One hundred thirty patients (58%) received an antibiotic therapy during surgery: 74 (33%) prophylaxis and 56 (25%) empirical antibiotic therapy, comprising 17 different regimens. The rate of prophylaxis varied according to the center, from 0 to 70%. A total of 208 patients were followed-up until removal of the first stent. The rate of UTIs was 6.3% (13/208); 8.1% of the patients who did not receive a prophylaxis had a UTI versus 1.4% of those who did receive a prophylaxis (p = 0.057). Seven empirical antibiotic regimens were used to treat these 13 patients. Another large panel of antibiotic prescriptions was observed at the time of JJ stent removal. The incidence of a UTI after JJ stent insertion for urolithiasis was 6.3%, in part due to a lack of prophylaxis. An unwarranted diversity of antibiotic use was observed at each step of care.

Indexed as

StentsUrolithiasisAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFranceHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic therapyHealthcare-associated infectionUreteral stentUrinary tract infectionUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID32591897
OpenAlexW3037021935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.