SynthesisClinical oral investigations2020
Use of platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05591326 (The Effect of Using Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin with Microneedling Technique on Creeping Attachment), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Using Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin with Microneedling Technique on Creeping Attachment
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Histological Outcomes of Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Pooled it
- Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF): A systematic review across all fields of medicine.Periodontology 2000 · 2025Pooled it
- Autologous platelet concentrates in root coverage procedures.Periodontology 2000 · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing the effectiveness of advanced platelet rich fibrin in treating gingival recession: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy of Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) for treatment of multiple gingival recession defects: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical effectiveness of periosteal pedicle graft for the management of gingival recession defects-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Evidence-based dentistry · 2023Pooled it
- Stability of biomaterials used in adjunct to coronally advanced flap: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Pooled it
- Is the use of platelet-rich fibrin effective in the healing, control of pain, and postoperative bleeding in the palatal area after free gingival graft harvesting? A systematic review of randomized clinical studies.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Pooled it
- Use of platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Pooled it
- Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Single and Multiple Coronally Advanced Flap for Type 1 Recession: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Pooled it
- Treatment of gingival recession type 1 using coronally advanced flap with leucocytes-platelet rich fibrin: a randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Comparative analysis of connective tissue graft versus ozone-enriched platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of Cairo class I gingival recessions: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2026Trial
- Treatment of gingival recession with vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and advanced platelet-rich fibrin.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- A comparative study of the effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin and resorbable collagen membrane in the treatment of gingival recession: a split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.Head & face medicine · 2024Trial
- Effect of Coenzyme Q10 on early wound healing after recession coverage surgery with the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique and a connective tissue graft: A 6-month, triple-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Trial
- Comparison of histologic and radiographic changes of sockets grafted with LPRF and sockets without intervention after tooth extraction.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Trial
- Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin with coronally advanced flap: a 12-month split-mouth controlled randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Trial
- Efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) for gingival phenotype modification: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- Platelet-rich fibrin vs. buccal advancement flap for closure of oroantral communications: a prospective clinical study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- Clinical evaluation of the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with connective tissue graft or concentrated growth factor using tunnel technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Trial
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) with other commonly utilized treatment modalities for root coverage procedures. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe eligibility criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the performance of PRF with that of other modalities in the treatment of Miller class I or II (Cairo RT I) gingival recessions. Studies were classified into 5 categories as follows: (1) coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone vs CAF/PRF, (2) CAF/connective tissue graft (CAF/CTG) vs CAF/PRF, (3) CAF/enamel matrix derivative (CAF/EMD) vs CAF/PRF, (4) CAF/amnion membrane (CAF/AM) vs CAF/PRF, and (5) CAF/CTG vs CAF/CTG/PRF. Studies were evaluated for percentage of relative root coverage (rRC; primary outcome), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized mucosa width (KMW), and probing depth (PD) (secondary outcomes).
resultsFrom 976 articles identified, 17 RCTs were included. The use of PRF statistically significantly increased rRC and CAL compared with CAF alone. No change in KMW or reduction in PD was reported. Compared with PRF, CTG resulted in statistically significantly better KMW and RC. No statistically significant differences were reported between the CAF/PRF and CAF/EMD groups or between the CAF/PRF and CAF/AM groups for any of the investigated parameters.
conclusionsThe use of CAF/PRF improved rRC and CAL compared with the use of CAF alone. While similar outcomes were observed between CAF/PRF and CAF/CTG for CAL and PD change, the latter group led to statistically significantly better outcomes in terms of rRC and KTW. In summary, the use of PRF in conjunction with CAF may represent a valid treatment modality for gingival recessions exhibiting adequate baseline KMW. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The data indicate that the use of PRF in conjunction with CAF statistically significantly improves rRC when compared with CAF alone but did not improve KMW. Therefore, in cases with limited baseline KMW, the use of CTG may be preferred over PRF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32591868What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.