Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591823›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2020

Histological intratumoral heterogeneity in pretreatment esophageal cancer biopsies predicts survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from the UK MRC OE02 trial.

Naser Davarzani, Lindsay C Hewitt, Matthew D Hale, Veerle Melotte, Matthew Nankivell, Gordon G A Hutchins, David Cunningham, William H Allum, Ruth E Langley, Shahab Jolani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic Impact of Serum SCC Antigen in the 566 Upfront Surgery Group of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study of the Japan Esophageal Society.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Naser DavarzaniDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center + Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lindsay C HewittDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center + Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Matthew D HaleDivision of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Veerle MelotteDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center + Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Matthew NankivellMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College, London, UK.
Gordon G A HutchinsDivision of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David CunninghamGastrointestinal and Lymphoma Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
William H AllumDepartment of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Ruth E LangleyMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College, London, UK.
Shahab JolaniDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Heike I GrabschDepartment of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center + Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the use of multimodal treatment, survival of esophageal cancer (EC) patients remains poor. One proposed explanation for the relatively poor response to cytotoxic chemotherapy is intratumor heterogeneity. The aim was to establish a statistical model to objectively measure intratumor heterogeneity of the proportion of tumor (IHPoT) and to use this newly developed method to measure IHPoT in the pretreatment biopsies from from EC patients recruited to the OE02 trial. A statistical mixed effect model (MEM) was established for estimating IHPoT based on variation in hematoxylin/eosin (HE) stained pretreatment biopsy pieces from the same individual in 218 OE02 trial patients (103 treated by chemotherapy and surgery (chemo+surgery); 115 patients treated by surgery alone). The relationship between IHPoT, prognosis, chemotherapy survival benefit, and clinicopathological variables was assessed. About 97 (44.5%) and 121 (55.5%) ECs showed high and low IHPoT, respectively. There was no significant difference in IHPoT between surgery (median [range], 0.1637 [0-3.17]) and chemo+surgery (median [range], 0.1692 [0-2.69]) patients (P = 0.43). Chemo+surgery patients with low IHPoT had a significantly longer survival than surgery patients (HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.20-2.75, P = 0.005). There was no survival difference between chemo+surgery and surgery patients with high IHPoT (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.72-1.81, P = 0.566). This is the first study suggesting that IHPoT measured in the pretreatment biopsy can predict chemotherapy survival benefit in EC patients. IHPoT may represent a clinically useful biomarker for patient treatment stratification. Future studies should determine if pathologists can reliably estimate IHPoT.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyBiopsyChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansPrognosisUnited Kingdomesophageal cancerhistological heterogeneityneoadjuvant chemotherapypretreatment biopsyproportion of tumor

Identifiers

PMID32591823
PMCPMC7397482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.