Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591581›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

CAM-Delam: an in vivo approach to visualize and quantify the delamination and invasion capacity of human cancer cells.

Tamilarasan K Palaniappan, Lina Šlekienė, Anna-Karin Jonasson, Jonathan Gilthorpe, Lena Gunhaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tamilarasan K PalaniappanUmeå Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. tamilarasan.palaniappan@umu.se.
Lina ŠlekienėUmeå Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Anna-Karin JonassonDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Jonathan GilthorpeDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Lena GunhagaUmeå Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden. lena.gunhaga@umu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of metastases is the major cause of cancer related death. To develop a standardized method that define the ability of human cancer cells to degrade the basement membrane, e.g. the delamination capacity, is of importance to assess metastatic aggressiveness. We now present the in vivo CAM-Delam assay to visualize and quantify the ability of human cancer cells to delaminate and invade. The method includes seeding cancer cells on the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM), followed by the evaluation of cancer-induced delamination and potential invasion within hours to a few days. By testing a range of human cancer cell lines in the CAM-Delam assay, our results show that the delamination capacity can be divided into four categories and used to quantify metastatic aggressiveness. Our results emphasize the usefulness of this assay for quantifying delamination capacity as a measurement of metastatic aggressiveness, and in unraveling the molecular mechanisms that regulate delamination, invasion, formation of micro-metastases and modulations of the tumor microenvironment. This method will be useful in both the preclinical and clinical characterization of tumor biopsies, and in the validation of compounds that may improve survival in metastatic cancer.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAnimalsBiological AssayCell Line, TumorChickensChorioallantoic MembraneHumansNeoplasmsPC-3 Cells

Identifiers

PMID32591581
PMCPMC7320147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.