Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591577›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Controller synthesis and clinical exploration of wearable gyroscopic actuators to support human balance.

Daniel Lemus, Andrew Berry, Saher Jabeen, Chandrasekaran Jayaraman, Kristen Hohl, Frans C T van der Helm, Arun Jayaraman, Heike Vallery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel Lemus *Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0633-4752
Andrew Berry *Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-8675
Saher JabeenDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands.
Chandrasekaran JayaramanMax Näder Center for Rehabilitation Technologies & Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Kristen HohlMax Näder Center for Rehabilitation Technologies & Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Frans C T van der HelmDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands.
Arun JayaramanMax Näder Center for Rehabilitation Technologies & Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Heike ValleryDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CD, The Netherlands. h.vallery@tudelft.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gyroscopic actuators are appealing for wearable applications due to their ability to provide overground balance support without obstructing the legs. Multiple wearable robots using this actuation principle have been proposed, but none has yet been evaluated with humans. Here we use the GyBAR, a backpack-like prototype portable robot, to investigate the hypothesis that the balance of both healthy and chronic stroke subjects can be augmented through moments applied to the upper body. We quantified balance performance in terms of each participant's ability to walk or remain standing on a narrow support surface oriented to challenge stability in either the frontal or the sagittal plane. By comparing candidate balance controllers, it was found that effective assistance did not require regulation to a reference posture. A rotational viscous field increased the distance healthy participants could walk along a 30mm-wide beam by a factor of 2.0, compared to when the GyBAR was worn but inactive. The same controller enabled individuals with chronic stroke to remain standing for a factor of 2.5 longer on a narrow block. Due to its wearability and versatility of control, the GyBAR could enable new therapy interventions for training and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

RoboticsWearable Electronic DevicesAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalancePostureStroke RehabilitationWalking

Identifiers

PMID32591577
PMCPMC7320159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.