Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Individual differences in local functional brain connectivity affect TMS effects on behavior.

Carsten Gießing, Mohsen Alavash, Christoph S Herrmann, Claus C Hilgetag, Christiane M Thiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carsten GießingBiological Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center Neurosensory Science and Systems, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany. carsten.giessing@uni-oldenburg.de.
Mohsen AlavashBiological Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center Neurosensory Science and Systems, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany.
Christoph S HerrmannExperimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center Neurosensory Science and Systems, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany.
Claus C HilgetagInstitute of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Christiane M ThielBiological Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Center Neurosensory Science and Systems, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, 26111, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) often show substantial differences between subjects. One factor that might contribute to these inter-individual differences is the interaction of current brain states with the effects of local brain network perturbation. The aim of the current study was to identify brain regions whose connectivity before and following right parietal perturbation affects individual behavioral effects during a visuospatial target detection task. 20 subjects participated in an fMRI experiment where their brain hemodynamic response was measured during resting state, and then during a visuospatial target detection task following 1 Hz rTMS and sham stimulation. To select a parsimonious set of associated brain regions, an elastic net analysis was used in combination with a whole-brain voxel-wise functional connectivity analysis. TMS-induced changes in accuracy were significantly correlated with the pattern of functional connectivity during the task state following TMS. The functional connectivity of the left superior temporal, angular, and precentral gyri was identified as key explanatory variable for the individual behavioral TMS effects. Our results suggest that the brain must reach an appropriate state in which right parietal TMS can induce improvements in visual target detection. The ability to reach this state appears to vary between individuals.

Indexed as

IndividualityAdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleFunctional LateralityHemodynamicsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeuropsychological TestsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32591568
PMCPMC7320140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.