Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591501›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Uncovering the effects of interface-induced ordering of liquid on crystal growth using machine learning.

Rodrigo Freitas, Evan J Reed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rotation of Crystal Seed During Early Stages of Growth Reveals the Anisotropy of Glass Matrix.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multi-Prismatic Hollow Cube CeVONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Limits to Crystallization Pressure.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodrigo FreitasDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. freitas@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-2916
Evan J ReedDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

DOE | National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) DE-NA0002007National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER-1455050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of crystallization is often understood in terms of the fundamental microstructural elements of the crystallite being formed, such as surface orientation or the presence of defects. Considerably less is known about the role of the liquid structure on the kinetics of crystal growth. Here atomistic simulations and machine learning methods are employed together to demonstrate that the liquid adjacent to solid-liquid interfaces presents significant structural ordering, which effectively reduces the mobility of atoms and slows down the crystallization kinetics. Through detailed studies of silicon and copper we discover that the extent to which liquid mobility is affected by interface-induced ordering (IIO) varies greatly with the degree of ordering and nature of the adjacent interface. Physical mechanisms behind the IIO anisotropy are explained and it is demonstrated that incorporation of this effect on a physically-motivated crystal growth model enables the quantitative prediction of the growth rate temperature dependence.

Identifiers

PMID32591501
PMCPMC7319977
OpenAlexW3037384236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.