Trial reportNeurology2020
Natalizumab in acute ischemic stroke (ACTION II): A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02730455 (Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Natalizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Dose-Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Natalizumab (BG00002) in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting Neuroinflammation in Adult Ischemic Stroke: Direct Immunotherapy, Regenerative Cell-Based Strategies, and Translational Challenges-A Systematic Review with Exploratory Meta-analysis.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing Early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Versus 90-Day Modified Rankin Scale Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trials: A Systematic Review and Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of IL-6 receptor inhibition on infarct volume after endovascular treatment for ischaemic stroke: a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.EBioMedicine · 2026Trial
- Tongxinluo and Functional Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Histone neutralization protects the ischemic brain against the consequences of stroke-associated pneumonia.Acta neuropathologica · 2026Article
- A roadmap towards clinical use of molecular biomarkers in acute ischaemic stroke.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
- Intercellular communication between peripheral monocytes and central nervous system cells in stroke.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Noninvasive or minimally invasive neuromodulation in animal models of acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2026Article
- Overestimation of ischemic core on baseline MRI in acute stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- Routine C-Reactive Protein on Admission and In-Hospital Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Neutrophil-Mimetic MRI Enables Ultra-Early Detection of Vascular Inflammation After Stroke.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Targeting CD4⁺ T cell infiltration: mechanisms and therapeutic insights into CD4⁺ T cell transmigration across the blood-brain barrier in acute ischemic stroke.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Review
- Melatonin alleviates neuroinflammation in ischemic stroke by regulating cyclic GMP-AMP synthase- mediated microglial pyroptosis signaling.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Neuroinflammation in Ischemic Stroke: Mechanisms, Systemic Interactions, and Therapeutic Targets.Translational stroke research · 2026Review
- Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Stroke: A Narrative Review Focusing on Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Integrative imaging and transcriptomics implicate neutrophils in microvascular no-reflow after stroke.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- "The emerging role of lymphocytes in post-stroke inflammation: A treatable target and review of current pharmacological evidence in humans".Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Review
- Neuroglia and immune cells play different roles in neuroinflammation and neuroimmune response in post-stroke neural injury and repair.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Deciphering the disease ecosystem of ischemic stroke via multi-omics and prospects for therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Systemic Inflammation Mediates the Association Between Admission Hyperglycemia and Pulmonary Infection or Prognosis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe evaluated the effect of 2 doses of natalizumab on functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
methodsIn this double-blind phase 2b trial, patients with AIS aged 18-80 years with NIH Stroke Scale scores of 5-23 from 53 US and European sites were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of 300 or 600 mg IV natalizumab or placebo, with randomization stratified by treatment window (≤9 or >9 to ≤24 hours from patient's last known normal state). The primary endpoint was a composite measure of excellent outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤1 and Barthel Index score ≥95) at day 90 assessed in all patients receiving a full dose. Sample size was estimated from a Bayesian model;
resultsAn excellent outcome was less likely with natalizumab than with placebo (natalizumab 300 or 600 mg odds ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.93). There was no effect modification by time to treatment or use of thrombolysis/thrombectomy. For natalizumab 300 mg, 600 mg, or placebo, there were no differences in incidence of adverse events (90.0%, 92.1%, and 92.3%, respectively), serious adverse events (25.6%, 32.6%, and 20.9%, respectively), or deaths (6.7%, 4.5%, and 5.5%, respectively).
conclusionsNatalizumab administered ≤24 hours after AIS did not improve patient outcomes. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02730455 CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with AIS, an excellent outcome was less likely in patients treated with natalizumab than with placebo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.