ArticleBMC nephrology2020
Chronic drug treatment among hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study of patients, nursing and medical staff attitudes and approaches.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- To Explore the Application of PDCA in Hemodialysis Center and Its Effect on the Maintenance of Internal Fistula.BioMed research international · 2022Trial
- Medication Adherence Barriers and Their Relationship to Health Determinants for Saudi Pediatric Dialysis Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Polypharmacy and Quality of Life Among Dialysis Patients: A Qualitative Study.Kidney medicine · 2024Article
- Development of a Predictive Nomogram for Estimating Medication Nonadherence in Hemodialysis Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
- Practices and pitfalls in medication adherence in hemodialysis settings - a focus-group study of health care professionals.BMC nephrology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDialysis patients have a high pill burden, increasing their care complexity. A previous study in our institution's dialysis unit found notable discrepancies between medication prescriptions, purchases and patient reports of medication use: overall adherence to medication was 57%, on average; staff reported patients took 3.1 more medication types than actual purchases; concordance of patient purchases and nurse reports was found in 5.7 out of 23.6 months of patient follow-up. We sought to investigate patients and staff concepts and attitudes regarding medication care and to understand better the previously identified inconsistencies.
methodsWe performed a qualitative research based on the grounded theory approach, using semi-structured, in-depth, interviews with patients and staff from the same dialysis unit studied previously, at the Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
resultsThough all respondents described a seemingly synchronized system of care, repeated questioning revealed that staff distrust patient medication reports. Patients, on their part, felt that their monitoring and supervision were bothersome and belittling. Along with patients, nurses and physicians, we identified a "fourth" factor, which influences medication care - the laboratory tests. They serve both as biological parameters of health, but also as parameters of patient adherence to the prescribed medication regimens.
conclusionsParticipant responses did not clearly resonate with previous findings from the quantitative study. The central role of laboratory tests should be carefully considered by the staff when interacting with patients. An interaction process, less adversarial, centering on the patient attitudes to medication care, might establish better communication, better cooperation and better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.