Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32591005›Full record

ArticleMolecular autism2020

IGF-1 treatment causes unique transcriptional response in neurons from individuals with idiopathic autism.

Sara B Linker, Ana P D Mendes, Maria C Marchetto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular autism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Variation of DNA methylation on theRegenerative therapy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. An Update on Psychopharmacological Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara B LinkerThe Salk Institute, Laboratory of Genetics, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Ana P D MendesThe Salk Institute, Laboratory of Genetics, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Maria C MarchettoThe Salk Institute, Laboratory of Genetics, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. marchetto@salk.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0449-9051
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

Transcriptional signature profiling of IGF1-treated neural cells from idiopathic autistic patientsR03MH115426 · NIMH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI MARCHETTO, MARIA CAROLINA · 2018 to 2019
$192k
NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH115426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch evidence accumulated in the past years in both rodent and human models for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have established insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) as one of the most promising ASD therapeutic interventions to date. ASD is phenotypically and etiologically heterogeneous, making it challenging to uncover the underlying genetic and cellular pathophysiology of the condition; and to efficiently design drugs with widespread clinical benefits. While IGF-1 effects have been comprehensively studied in the literature, how IGF-1 activity may lead to therapeutic recovery in the ASD context is still largely unknown.

methodsIn this study, we used a previously characterized neuronal population derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) from neurotypical controls and idiopathic ASD individuals to study the transcriptional signature of acutely and chronically IGF-1-treated cells.

resultsWe present a comprehensive list of differentially regulated genes and molecular interactions resulting from IGF-1 exposure in developing neurons from controls and ASD individuals. Our results indicate that IGF-1 treatment has a different impact on neurons from ASD patients compared to controls. Response to IGF-1 treatment in neurons derived from ASD patients was heterogeneous and correlated with IGF-1 receptor expression, indicating that IGF-1 response may have responder and non-responder distinctions across cohorts of ASD patients. Our results suggest that caution should be used when predicting the effect of IGF-1 treatment on ASD patients using neurotypical controls. Instead, IGF-1 response should be studied in the context of ASD patients' neural cells. LIMITATIONS: The limitation of our study is that our cohort of eight sporadic ASD individuals is comorbid with macrocephaly in childhood. Future studies will address weather downstream transcriptional response of IGF-1 is comparable in non-macrocephalic ASD cohorts.

conclusionsThe results presented in this study provide an important resource for researchers in the ASD field and underscore the necessity of using ASD patient lines to explore ASD neuronal-specific responses to drugs such as IGF-1. This study further helps to identify candidate pathways and targets for effective clinical intervention and may help to inform clinical trials in the future.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderGene Expression ProfilingHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsInsulin-Like Growth Factor INeuronsReceptor, IGF Type 1Transcription, GeneticInsulin-Like Growth Factor IReceptor, IGF Type 1AutismDisease modelingInduced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)

Identifiers

PMID32591005
PMCPMC7320548
OpenAlexW3037010733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.