Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32590936›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Maternal dietary resistant starch does not improve piglet's gut and liver metabolism when challenged with a high fat diet.

Martine Schroyen, Julie Leblois, Julie Uerlings, Bing Li, Ester Arévalo Sureda, Sébastien Massart, José Wavreille, Jérôme Bindelle, Nadia Everaert

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martine SchroyenPrecision Livestock and Nutrition Laboratory, Teaching and Research Centre (TERRA), Gembloux AgroBioTech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportes 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Julie LebloisAssociation Wallonne de l'Elevage asbl (AWÉ), Champs Elysées 4, 5590, Ciney, Belgium.
Julie UerlingsPrecision Livestock and Nutrition Laboratory, Teaching and Research Centre (TERRA), Gembloux AgroBioTech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportes 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Bing LiPrecision Livestock and Nutrition Laboratory, Teaching and Research Centre (TERRA), Gembloux AgroBioTech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportes 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Ester Arévalo SuredaPrecision Livestock and Nutrition Laboratory, Teaching and Research Centre (TERRA), Gembloux AgroBioTech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportes 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Sébastien MassartLaboratory of Urban and Integrated PhytoPathology, Teaching and Research Centre (TERRA), Gembloux AgroBioTech, University of Liège, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
José WavreilleProduction and Sectors Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre (CRA-W), 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Jérôme BindellePrecision Livestock and Nutrition Laboratory, Teaching and Research Centre (TERRA), Gembloux AgroBioTech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportes 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium.
Nadia EveraertPrecision Livestock and Nutrition Laboratory, Teaching and Research Centre (TERRA), Gembloux AgroBioTech, University of Liège, Passage des Déportes 2, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium. nadia.everaert@uliege.be.
University of Liège · BEGembloux Agro-Bio Tech · BEAgence Wallonne du Patrimoine · BEWalloon Agricultural Research Centre · BE

Funding

Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS (BE) 31248729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past several years, the use of resistant starch (RS) as prebiotic has extensively been studied in pigs, and this mostly in the critical period around weaning. RS is believed to exert beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal tract mainly due to higher levels of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and an improved microbiota profile. In this study, sows were fed digestible starch (DS) or RS during late gestation and lactation and the possible maternal effect of RS on the overall health of the progeny was assessed. Since RS is also described to have a positive effect on metabolism, and to investigate a metabolic programming of the progeny, half of the piglets per maternal diet were assigned to a high fat diet from weaning on to 10 weeks after.

resultsNo bodyweight differences were found between the four experimental piglet groups. The high fat diet did however impact back fat thickness and meat percentage whereas maternal diet did not influence these parameters. The impact of the high fat diet was also reflected in higher levels of serum cholesterol. No major differences in microbiota could be distinguished, although higher levels of SCFA were seen in the colon of piglets born from RS fed sows, and some differences in SCFA production were observed in the caecum, mainly due to piglet diet. RNA-sequencing on liver and colon scrapings revealed minor differences between the maternal diet groups. Merely a handful of genes was differentially expressed between piglets from DS and RS sows, and network analysis showed only one significant cluster of genes in the liver due to the maternal diet that did not point to meaningful biological pathways. However, the high fat diet resulted in liver gene clusters that were significantly correlated with piglet diet, of which one is annotated for lipid metabolic processes. These clusters were not correlated with maternal diet.

conclusionsThere is only a minor impact of maternal dietary RS on the progeny, reflected in SCFA changes. A high fat diet given to the progeny directly evokes metabolic changes in the liver, without any maternal programming by a RS diet.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBody WeightCecumCholesterolDiet, High-FatFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksLiverMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPregnancyResistant StarchSequence Analysis, RNASwineCholesterolFatty Acids, VolatileResistant StarchMaternal programmingMetabolic programmingMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID32590936
PMCPMC7318506
OpenAlexW3037189900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.