ArticleMedicine2020
Xiaoaiping injection as adjunct therapy for patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-Components in ModifiedClinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2025Article
- The value of microRNA-203 as a biomarker for the prognosis of esophageal cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Article
- Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of Kang-ai injection for patients with oesophageal cancer.Medicine · 2020Article
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Literature Review.Integrative cancer therapiesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal carcinoma (EC) is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with a strong tendency of invasion and metastasis. Despite the improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic methods in the past decades, the prognosis of EC remains unsatisfactory. Xiaoaiping injection (XAPI), a famous traditional Chinese herbal medicine, has been widely applied as a promising adjunctive drug for EC. However, the exact effects and safety of XAPI have yet to be systematically investigated. We aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of XAPI for the treatment of advanced EC through the meta-analysis, in order to provide scientific reference for the design of future clinical trials.
methodsRelevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched from Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Excerpt Medica Database, Medline, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Scientific Journal Database and Wanfang Database. Papers in English or Chinese published from January 2000 to May 2020 will be included without any restrictions.Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by 2 investigators. The clinical outcomes including overall response rate, complete response rate, overall survival, Disease-free survival, quality of life, immune function and adverse events, were systematically evaluated. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0 were used for data analysis, and the quality of the studies was also evaluated.
resultsThe results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and provide more evidence-based guidance in clinical practice.
conclusionOur study will draw an objective conclusion of the effects of XAPI combined with conventional treatment for advanced EC and provide a helpful evidence for clinicians to formulate the best postoperative adjuvant treatment strategy for EC patients. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202050094.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.