Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32589979›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Haematology2020

Implementing newborn screening for sickle cell disease as part of immunisation programmes in Nigeria: a feasibility study.

Obiageli E Nnodu, Alayo Sopekan, Uche Nnebe-Agumadu, Chinatu Ohiaeri, Adeyemi Adeniran, Grace Shedul, Hezekiah A Isa, Olumide Owolabi, Reuben I Chianumba, Yohanna Tanko and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Haematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advances and Gaps in Global Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Obiageli E NnoduSickle Cell Disease Desk, Non-Communicable Disease Unit, Federal Ministry of Health, Federal Secretariat, Abuja, Nigeria. Electronic address: obiageli.nnodu@uniabuja.edu.ng.
Alayo SopekanSickle Cell Disease Desk, Non-Communicable Disease Unit, Federal Ministry of Health, Federal Secretariat, Abuja, Nigeria.
Uche Nnebe-AgumaduDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Chinatu OhiaeriDepartment of Paediatrics, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nigeria.
Adeyemi AdeniranDepartment of Health, Gwagwalada Area Council Secretariat, Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria.
Grace ShedulPharmacy Department, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital Gwagwalada, Abuja, Nigeria.
Hezekiah A IsaCentre of Excellence for Sickle Cell Disease Research and Training, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Olumide OwolabiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Reuben I ChianumbaCentre of Excellence for Sickle Cell Disease Research and Training, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Yohanna TankoCentre of Excellence for Sickle Cell Disease Research and Training, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Juliet H IyobosaCentre of Excellence for Sickle Cell Disease Research and Training, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Adekunle D AdekileDepartment of Paediatrics, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
Olufunmilayo I OlopadeCentre for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Frédéric B PielDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
University of Abuja · NGFederal Ministry of Health · NGUniversity of Abuja Teaching Hospital · NGCancer Genetics (United States) · USFederal Medical Centre · NGImperial College London · GBKuwait University · KW

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSickle cell disease is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, where it accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality. Newborn screening is paramount for early diagnosis and enrolment of affected children into a comprehensive care programme. Up to now, this strategy has been greatly impaired in resource-poor countries, because screening methods are technologically and financially intensive; affordable, reliable, and accurate methods are needed. We aimed to test the feasibility of implementing a sickle cell disease screening programme using innovative point-of-care test devices into existing immunisation programmes in primary health-care settings.

methodsBuilding on a routine immunisation programme and using existing facilities and staff, we did a prospective feasibility study at five primary health-care centres within Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria. We systematically screened for sickle cell disease consecutive newborn babies and infants younger than 9 months who presented to immunisation clinics at these five centres, using an ELISA-based point-of care test (HemoTypeSC). A subgroup of consecutive babies who presented to immunisation clinics at the primary health-care centres, whose mothers gave consent, were tested by the HemoTypeSC point-of-care test alongside a different immunoassay-based point-of-care test (SickleSCAN) and the gold standard test, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

findingsBetween July 14, 2017, and Sept 3, 2019, 3603 newborn babies and infants who presented for immunisation were screened for sickle cell disease at five primary health-care centres using the ELISA-based point-of-care test. We identified 51 (1%) children with sickle cell anaemia (HbSS), four (<1%) heterozygous for HbS and HbC (HbSC), 740 (21%) with sickle cell trait (HbAS), 34 (1%) heterozygous for HbA and HbC (HbAC), and 2774 (77%) with normal haemoglobin (HbAA). Of the 55 babies and infants with confirmed sickle cell disease, 41 (75%) were enrolled into a programme for free folic acid and penicillin, of whom 36 (88%) completed three visits over 9 months (median follow-up 226 days [IQR 198-357]). The head-to-head comparison between the two point-of-care tests and HPLC showed concordance between the three testing methods in screening 313 newborn babies, with a specificity of 100% with HemoTypeSC, 100% with SickleSCAN, and 100% by HPLC, and a sensitivity of 100% with HemoTypeSC, 100% with SickleSCAN, and 100% by HPLC.

interpretationOur pilot study shows that the integration of newborn screening into existing primary health-care immunisation programmes is feasible and can rapidly be implemented with limited resources. Point-of-care tests are reliable and accurate in newborn screening for sickle cell disease. This feasibility study bodes well for the care of patients with sickle cell disease in resource-poor countries.

fundingDoris Duke Charitable Foundation, Imperial College London Wellcome Trust Centre for Global Health Research, and Richard and Susan Kiphart Family Foundation.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningAnemia, Sickle CellDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfant, NewbornMaleNigeriaPilot ProjectsPoint-of-Care TestingProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32589979
PMCPMC7322555
OpenAlexW3037778055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.