Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32589679›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A publicly available virtual cohort of four-chamber heart meshes for cardiac electro-mechanics simulations.

Marina Strocchi, Christoph M Augustin, Matthias A F Gsell, Elias Karabelas, Aurel Neic, Karli Gillette, Orod Razeghi, Anton J Prassl, Edward J Vigmond, Jonathan M Behar and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The multi-modal digital heart: From future perspective to challenges.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Computational modelling of biological systems now and then: revisiting tools and visions from the beginning of the century.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. An in silico guide for ventriculo-ventricular delay programming for left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. From bits to bedside: entering the age of digital twins in cardiac electrophysiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marina StrocchiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1312-251X
Christoph M AugustinInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria.
Matthias A F GsellInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria.
Elias KarabelasSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4496-1933
Aurel NeicNumeriCor GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Karli GilletteInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria.
Orod RazeghiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.
Anton J PrasslInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria.
Edward J VigmondIHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, F-33600 Pessac- Bordeaux, France.
Jonathan M BeharSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.
Justin GouldSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.
Baldeep SidhuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.
Christopher A RinaldiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.
Martin J BishopSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.
Gernot PlankInstitute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Steiermark, Austria.
Steven A NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, City of London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBMedical University of Graz · ATUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/13/37/30280British Heart Foundation PG/15/91/31812Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models of the heart are increasingly being used in the development of devices, patient diagnosis and therapy guidance. While software techniques have been developed for simulating single hearts, there remain significant challenges in simulating cohorts of virtual hearts from multiple patients. To facilitate the development of new simulation and model analysis techniques by groups without direct access to medical data, image analysis techniques and meshing tools, we have created the first publicly available virtual cohort of twenty-four four-chamber hearts. Our cohort was built from heart failure patients, age 67±14 years. We segmented four-chamber heart geometries from end-diastolic (ED) CT images and generated linear tetrahedral meshes with an average edge length of 1.1±0.2mm. Ventricular fibres were added in the ventricles with a rule-based method with an orientation of -60° and 80° at the epicardium and endocardium, respectively. We additionally refined the meshes to an average edge length of 0.39±0.10mm to show that all given meshes can be resampled to achieve an arbitrary desired resolution. We ran simulations for ventricular electrical activation and free mechanical contraction on all 1.1mm-resolution meshes to ensure that our meshes are suitable for electro-mechanical simulations. Simulations for electrical activation resulted in a total activation time of 149±16ms. Free mechanical contractions gave an average left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) of 35±1% and 30±2%, respectively, and a LV and RV stroke volume (SV) of 95±28mL and 65±11mL, respectively. By making the cohort publicly available, we hope to facilitate large cohort computational studies and to promote the development of cardiac computational electro-mechanics for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHeart FailureHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurgical MeshVentricular Function, LeftVentricular Function, Right

Identifiers

PMID32589679
PMCPMC7319311
OpenAlexW3037817333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.