ArticlePloS one2020
Histological evaluation of cellular response to a multifilament electrospun suture for tendon repair.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural, synthetic and commercially-available biopolymers used to regenerate tendons and ligaments.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
- State-of-the-art review of advanced electrospun nanofiber yarn-based textiles for biomedical applications.Applied materials today · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRotator cuff tendon repair in humans is a commonly performed procedure aimed at restoring the tendon-bone interface. Despite significant innovation of surgical techniques and suture anchor implants, only 60% of repairs heal successfully. One strategy to enhance repair is the use of bioactive sutures that provide the native tendon with biophysical cues for healing. We investigated the tissue response to a multifilament electrospun polydioxanone (PDO) suture in a sheep tendon injury model characterised by a natural history of failure of healing. METHODOLOGY AND
resultsEight skeletally mature English Mule sheep underwent repair with electrospun sutures. Monofilament sutures were used as a control. Three months after surgery, all tendon repairs healed, without systemic features of inflammation, signs of tumour or infection at necropsy. A mild local inflammatory reaction was seen. On histology the electrospun sutures were densely infiltrated with predominantly tendon fibroblast-like cells. In comparison, no cellular infiltration was observed in the control suture. Neovascularisation was observed within the electrospun suture, whilst none was seen in the control. Foreign body giant cells were rarely seen with either sutures.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that a tissue response can be induced in tendon with a multifilament electrospun suture with no safety concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.