ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2020
Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts produced by dental implants with different geometries.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental materials: a systematic review.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2022Pooled it
- A comparative study of artifact reduction techniques in metal-implanted CT scans.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2026Review
- Assessment of the intrasinusidal volume before and after maxillary sinus augmentation using mri - a pilot study of eight patients.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Assessing bone formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in a murine model treated with bisphosphonates.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Performance of PROPELLER FSE TScientific reports · 2022Article
- Susceptibility artifacts induced by crowns of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants in magnetic resonance imaging.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Trabecular Bone Assessment Using Magnetic-Resonance Imaging: A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the MRI-artifact pattern produced by titanium and zirconia dental implants with different geometries (diameter and height).
methodsThree titanium (Titan SLA, Straumann) and three zirconia (Pure Ceramic Implant, Straumann) dental implants differing on their design (diameter x height) were installed in porcine bone samples. Samples were scanned with a MRI (3T, T1W turbo spin echo sequence, TR/TE 25/3.5ms, voxel size 0.22×0.22×0.50 mm, scan time 11:18). Micro-CT was used as control group (80kV, 125mA, voxel size 16µm). Artifacts' distribution was measured at vestibular and lingual sites, mesial and distal sites, and at the apex. Statistical analysis was performed with Within-ANOVA (p=0.05).
resultsArtifacts distribution measured 2.57 ± 1.09 mm for titanium artifacts and 0.37 ± 0.20 mm for zirconia artifacts (p<0.05). Neither the measured sites (p=0.73) nor the implant geometries (p=0.43) influenced the appearance of artifacts.
conclusionArtifacts were higher for titanium than zirconia implants. The artifacts pattern was similar for different dental implant geometries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.