Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32589282›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2020

Building a National Program for Pilot Studies of Embedded Pragmatic Clinical Trials in Dementia Care.

Abraham A Brody, Deborah E Barnes, Joshua Chodosh, James E Galvin, Kenneth W Hepburn, Andrea B Troxel, Kimberly Hom, Ellen P McCarthy, Kathleen T Unroe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reflections on the IJHPR's article collection on dementia.Israel journal of health policy research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Abraham A BrodyHartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3405-7043
Deborah E BarnesDepartment of Psychiatry and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA.
Joshua ChodoshDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
James E GalvinDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Kenneth W HepburnNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andrea B TroxelDivision of Biostatistics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Kimberly HomHartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.
Ellen P McCarthyHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kathleen T UnroeCenter for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
John A. Hartford Foundation · USNew York University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USRegenstrief Institute · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Miami · USWoodruff Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Training Core (I)U54AG063546 · NIA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JASON H KARLAWISH · 2019 to 2026
$125.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066512 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Mary Sherman Mittelman · 2020 to 2026
$28.4M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066512NIA NIH HHS U54 AG063546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sixteen million caregivers currently provide care to more than 5 million persons living with dementia (PLWD) in the United States. Although this population is growing and highly complex, evidence-based management remains poorly integrated within healthcare systems. Therefore, the National Institute on Aging IMPACT Collaboratory was formed to build the nation's ability to conduct embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) for PLWD and their caregivers. The pilot core of the IMPACT Collaboratory seeks to provide funds for upward of 40 pilots for ePCTs to accelerate the testing of nonpharmacologic interventions with the goal that these pilots lead to full-scale ePCTs and eventually the embedding of evidence-based care into healthcare systems. The first two challenges for the pilot core in building the pilot study program were (1) to develop a transparent, ethical, and open nationwide process for soliciting, reviewing, and selecting pilot studies; and (2) to begin the process of describing the necessary components of a pilot study for an ePCT. During our initial funding cycle, we received 35 letters of intent, of which 17 were accepted for a full proposal and 14 were submitted. From this process we learned that investigators lack knowledge in ePCTs, many interventions lack readiness for an ePCT pilot study, and many proposed studies lack key pragmatic design elements. We therefore have set three key criteria that future pilot studies must meet at a minimum to be considered viable. We additionally discuss key design decisions investigators should consider in designing a pilot study for an ePCT. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:S14-S20, 2020.

Indexed as

Pragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProgram DevelopmentResearch DesignCaregiversDementiaHumansNational Institute on Aging (U.S.)Pilot ProjectsResearch PersonnelUnited StatesAlzheimer's diseasedementianonpharmacologic interventionspilot studypragmatic trials

Identifiers

PMID32589282
PMCPMC7393801
OpenAlexW3037231499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.