Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32589158›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2020

The Feasibility and Utility of a Personal Health Record for Persons With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers for Web-Based Care Coordination: Mixed Methods Study.

Colleen M Peterson, Jude P Mikal, Hayley R McCarron, Jessica M Finlay, Lauren L Mitchell, Joseph E Gaugler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Patient Portal Use Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Colleen M Peterson *Division of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-3440
Jude P MikalDivision of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5394-9592
Hayley R McCarronDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-452X
Jessica M FinlayInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3427-8003
Lauren L MitchellCenter for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System & University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7900-1924
Joseph E GauglerDivision of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4797-485X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManaging the complex and long-term care needs of persons living with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) can adversely impact the health of informal caregivers and their care recipients. Web-based personal health records (PHRs) are one way to potentially alleviate a caregiver's burden by simplifying ADRD health care management.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate Personal Health Record for Persons with Dementia and Their Family Caregivers (PHR-ADRD), a free web-based information exchange tool, using a multiphase mixed methods approach.

methodsDementia caregivers (N=34) were surveyed for their well-being and perceptions of PHR-ADRD feasibility and utility at 6 and 12 months using close- and open-ended questions as well as a semistructured interview (n=8). Exploratory analyses compared participants' characteristics as well as PHR-ADRD use and experiences based on overall favorability status.

resultsFeasibility and utility scores decreased over time, but a subset of participants indicated that the system was helpful. Quantitative comparisons could not explain why some participants indicated favorable, neutral, or unfavorable views of the system overall or had not engaged with PHR-ADRD. Qualitative findings suggested that technology literacy and primary care provider buy-in were barriers. Both qualitative and qualitative findings indicated that time constraints to learn and use the system affected most participants.

conclusionsDevelopment and dissemination of PHRs for family caregivers of persons with ADRD should aim to make systems user-friendly for persons with limited time and technological literacy. Establishing health care provider buy-in may be essential to the future success of any PHR system.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseaseassistive technologycaregiver burnoutdisease managementfamily caregivinginformal caregivingpersonal health recordtechnologyweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID32589158
PMCPMC7381256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.