Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32589148›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2020

Web-Based Health Coaching for Spinal Cord Injury: Results From a Mixed Methods Feasibility Evaluation.

Sonya Allin, John Shepherd, Teri Thorson, Jennifer Tomasone, Sarah Munce, Gary Linassi, Christopher B McBride, Tizneem Jiancaro, Susan Jaglal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. SCI Thrive: Impact of a peer-led online self-management program.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk Factors Associated With Suicidal Ideation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Current Approaches in Telehealth and Telerehabilitation for Spinal Cord Injury (TeleSCI).Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sonya AllinDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6611-2265
John ShepherdDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8072-3775
Teri ThorsonSpinal Cord Injury BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-976X
Jennifer TomasoneSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0446-9706
Sarah MunceToronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-8395
Gary LinassiDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-4262
Christopher B McBrideSpinal Cord Injury BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-4118
Tizneem JiancaroDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3546-3972
Susan JaglalDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2930-1443
University of Toronto · CASpinal Cord Injury BC · CAQueen's University · CAToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at high risk of experiencing secondary conditions like pressure injuries. Self-management programs may reduce the risk of complications, but traditional programs have proven to be insufficiently tailored to the needs of people with SCI. To overcome barriers to self-management support, a web-based, self-management program was developed for Canadians with SCI called SCI & U.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the feasibility and potential impact of the SCI & U program in the context of a mixed methods pilot study.

methodsThe study followed an explanatory, sequential mixed methods design. Participants (N=11) were Canadians with SCI who had been living in the community for more than 1 year. Each took part in a self-paced, six-session self-management program guided by a trained peer health coach. During sessions, participants could discuss a health topic with their coach from a predefined list (eg, skin or bowel management). Quantitative data were gathered before and after program participation to assess program feasibility and impact. Feasibility measures included attrition rates, frequency of topics selected, and recorded goals, whereas impact measures included measures of self-efficacy (University of Washington Self-Efficacy Scale [UW-SES]), mood (Personal Health Questionnaire Depression Scale [PHQ-8]), secondary conditions (Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale [SCI-SCS]), and resilience (Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Resilience Scale [SCI-QOL-R]). Qualitative measures were based on postintervention interviews; these were designed to confirm and expand on quantitative.

resultsOf the 11 participants, 10 completed pre- and postassessments, and 6 coaching sessions. Sessions lasted between 31 and 81 min (average 55, SD 13), and the duration of the program ranged from 35 to 88 days (average 56, SD 23). Diet and exercise were selected as topics 40% (20/50 sessions with topics) of the time, whereas topics such as mental health, bladder management, pain, and bowel management were chosen less frequently. Results gathered before and after the pilot study demonstrated improvements with moderate effect sizes on the UW-SES and the electronic health literacy scale (ie, Hedges g>0.5). Effect sizes for measures of resilience (SCI-QOL-R), depression (PHQ-8), and secondary conditions (SCI-SCS) were small (ie, Hedges g>0.3). Qualitative results confirmed a common focus on diet and exercise, and defined coaches as sources of accountability, information, reassurance and affirmation, and emotional and technical support.

conclusionsResults demonstrated that a web-based self-management program is feasible and acceptable by Canadians with SCI. Results also indicated a web-based, peer-led self-management program may impact resilience, self-efficacy, mood, and secondary complications. Finally, results illuminated the role of the coach in facilitating behavior change. Future work seeks to validate results in the context of a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

community-based participatory researchinternet-based interventionmotivational interviewingself-managementspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID32589148
PMCPMC7428932
OpenAlexW3035000917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.