Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32589140›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Estimating and interpreting nonlinear receptive field of sensory neural responses with deep neural network models.

Menoua Keshishian, Hassan Akbari, Bahar Khalighinejad, Jose L Herrero, Ashesh D Mehta, Nima Mesgarani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interference of Mid-level Speech and Noise Statistics Underlies Human Speech Recognition Sensitivity in Natural Environmental Noise.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. A hierarchy of processing complexity and timescales for natural sounds in the human auditory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Scalable Gaussian process inference of neural responses to natural images.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Menoua KeshishianDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0368-288X
Hassan AkbariDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Bahar KhalighinejadDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States.
Jose L HerreroFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, United States.
Ashesh D MehtaFeinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7293-1101
Nima MesgaraniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2987-759X
Columbia University · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Neurophysiology of robust speech perception in human superior temporal gyrusR01DC014279 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Nima MESGARANI · 2015 to 2026
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of nonlinear stimulus transformations by neural circuits is hindered by the lack of comprehensive yet interpretable computational modeling frameworks. Here, we propose a data-driven approach based on deep neural networks to directly model arbitrarily nonlinear stimulus-response mappings. Reformulating the exact function of a trained neural network as a collection of stimulus-dependent linear functions enables a locally linear receptive field interpretation of the neural network. Predicting the neural responses recorded invasively from the auditory cortex of neurosurgical patients as they listened to speech, this approach significantly improves the prediction accuracy of auditory cortical responses, particularly in nonprimary areas. Moreover, interpreting the functions learned by neural networks uncovered three distinct types of nonlinear transformations of speech that varied considerably from primary to nonprimary auditory regions. The ability of this framework to capture arbitrary stimulus-response mappings while maintaining model interpretability leads to a better understanding of cortical processing of sensory signals.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionElectrocorticographyHumansModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerNonlinear DynamicsSensory Receptor CellsSpeechcomputational modelinghumanhuman auditory cortexneurosciencesensory processingspeech

Identifiers

PMID32589140
PMCPMC7347387
OpenAlexW3038121656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.