ArticleCancer medicine2020
Development and validation of a pretreatment nomogram to predict overall survival in gastric cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Gustave Roussy Immune (GRIm) score as a novel prognostic biomarker for gastrointestinal cancers: a meta-analysis of sixteen studies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical significance of the pretreatment C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of the pretreatment Naples prognostic score in gastrointestinal cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis with 28 studies.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in gastric cancer patients: A meta-analysis of 9,764 participants.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Prognostic significance of the Gustave Roussy immune (GRIm) score in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Construction and validation of prognostic nomograms for elderly patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.The clinical respiratory journal · 2022Trial
- Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting overall survival in patients with gastric carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- A prognostic nomogram to predict the cancer-specific survival of patients with initially diagnosed metastatic gastric cancer: a validation study in a Chinese cohort.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
- Application of Survival Quilts for prognosis prediction of gastrectomy patients based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and China National Cancer Center Gastric Cancer database.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2024Article
- Merkel cell carcinoma recurrence risk estimation is improved by integrating factors beyond cancer stage: A multivariable model and web-based calculator.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a novel nomogram for postoperative overall survival of patients with primary gastric signet-ring cell carcinoma: a population study based on SEER database.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Tumor size as a significant prognostic factor in T1 gastric cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Development and Multicenter Validation of a Novel Immune-Inflammation-Based Nomogram to Predict Survival in Western Resectable Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma (GEA): The NOMOGAST.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A model established using marital status and other factors from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for early stage gastric cancer.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2022Article
- Development of web-based dynamic nomogram to predict survival in patients with gastric cancer: a population-based study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Review
- Development and validation of pretreatment nomogram for disease-specific mortality in gastric cancer-A competing risk analysis.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Expression and prognostic potential of ribosome 18S RNA mCancer cell international · 2021Article
- A Population-Based Study: How to Identify High-Risk T1-2 Esophageal Cancer Patients?Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Development and External Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Stomach Cancer: A Population-Based Study.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPretreatment clinical staging is essential to select therapy. However, there have been no published pretreatment gastric cancer nomograms constructed using pretreatment clinical prognostic factors, including in nonresection patients. We aimed to develop a new pretreatment gastric cancer nomogram for individualized prediction of overall survival (OS).
methodsThe nomogram was developed using data of 5231 Japanese gastric cancer patients, and it was created with a Cox regression model. Fifteen clinical variables, which were obtained at pretreatment, were collected and registered. Data of two independent cohorts of patients from Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (1001 patients), and the University of Verona (389 patients) formed the external validation cohorts. The model was validated internally and externally using measures of discrimination (Harrell's C-index), calibration, and decision curve analysis.
resultsThe developed nomogram showed good discrimination, with a C-index of 0.855; that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage was 0.819. In the external validation procedure, the C-indexes were 0.856 (AJCC, 0.795) in the Seoul St. Mary's cohort and 0.714 (AJCC, 0.648) in the University of Verona cohort. The nomogram performed well in the calibration and decision curve analyses when applied to both the internal and external validation cohorts. A stage-specific subset survival analysis of the three risk groups calculated using the nomogram also showed the superiority of nomogram-prediction when compared to AJCC.
conclusionThis new pretreatment model accurately predicts OS in gastric cancer and can be used for patient counseling in clinical practice and stratification in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.