Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588811›Full record

ReviewEcoSal Plus2020

Tânia A T Gomes, Tadasuke Ooka, Rodrigo T Hernandes, Denise Yamamoto, Tetsuya Hayashi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EcoSal Plus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First report ofASM case reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cases of Isolation ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Whole-genome-based characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  8. TccP4: a novel effector identified in theMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. An outbreak associated withEpidemiology and infection · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  18. Genes · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tânia A T GomesDepartamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tadasuke OokaDepartment of Microbiology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Rodrigo T HernandesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Campus de Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Denise YamamotoUniversidade Santo Amaro, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tetsuya HayashiDepartment of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsEscherichiaEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsGastroenteritisGenome, BacterialHumansMiceShiga ToxinVirulence FactorsShiga ToxinVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID32588811
PMCPMC11168576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.