ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2020
Post-Marketing Surveillance of Quality of Artemether Injection Marketed in Southwest Nigeria.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality evaluation of cephalexin, cefuroxime, and ceftriaxone medicines marketed in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia with three tier level approach and anti-microbial assays.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Assessment of Quality of Antimalarial Medicines in Mainland Tanzania: Insights from Five Years of Postmarket Surveillance.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
- Quality assessment of common anti-malarial medicines marketed in Gambella, National Regional State, South Western-Ethiopia.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- Quality of Essential Medicines from Different Sources in Enugu and Anambra, Nigeria.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to good-quality medicines remains a contentious issue in developing countries. This development is worrisome, particularly in a setting with a high incidence of malaria. Monitoring of antimalarial drugs in the commercial domain becomes necessary; thus, we evaluated the quality of artemether injection marketed in Southwest Nigeria. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to obtain 22 different brands of artemether injections within Southwest Nigeria. The samples were examined for their sources, lot numbers, containers for injection, oil base used for preparation, and dates of expiration. Further analysis involved visual inspection, assessment of extractable volume, identity tests, and an assay of active pharmaceutical ingredient. The pharmaceutical quality of each sample was determined according to the criteria set in the International Pharmacopoeia 2019. None of the products had any particulate matter, but there were certain irregularities in their presentation. Eighteen of the 22 products (81.7%) were packaged in plain instead of amber-colored ampoules, and 77.3% (17/22) did not indicate the oil base used as the vehicle on the label as against the pharmacopoeial standard. Sixteen products (72.7%) passed the extractable volume test, although the remaining 22.3% did not conform to the extractable volume per unit dose. Artemether was present in all the samples, although only 40.9% (9/22) met the recommended percentage content of 90-110% of artemether. The study revealed the presence of a high percentage of substandard artemether injection products marketed in Nigeria. Further surveillance is warranted to confirm the quality of artemether injection circulated in other regions within Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.