Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588712›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care

Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Ann Dalton Bagchi, Tracy Davis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. High acceptability of point-of-care HIV testing at the colposcopy outpatient clinic in hospitals in the Netherlands.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ann Dalton BagchiSchool of Nursing, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-0908
Tracy DavisDepartment of Interdisciplinary Studies, School of Health Professions Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Blackwood, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine HIV screening rates are suboptimal.

objectivesThis systematic review identified barriers to/facilitators of routine HIV testing, categorized them using the socioecological model (SEM), and provided recommendations for interventions to increase screening. DATA SOURCES: Included articles were indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between 2006 and October 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included studies were published in English or Spanish and directly assessed providers' barriers/facilitators to routine screening. DATA EXTRACTION: We used a standardized Excel template to extract barriers/facilitators and identify levels in the SEM. DATA SYNTHESIS: Intrapersonal factors predominated as barriers, while facilitators were directed at the institutional level. LIMITATIONS: Policy barriers are not universal across countries. Meta-analysis was not possible. We could not quantify frequency of any given barrier/facilitator.

conclusionsIncreasing reimbursement and adding screening as a quality measure may incentivize HIV testing; however, many interventions would require little resource investment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityMass ScreeningHIV InfectionsHumansbarriersfacilitatorsHIVprimary caretesting guidelines

Identifiers

PMID32588712
PMCPMC7322815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.