Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588654›Full record

ArticleEvaluation review2020

Making Evidence-Based Interventions Relevant for Users: A Comparison of Requirements for Dissemination Readiness Across Program Registries.

Pamela R Buckley, Abigail A Fagan, Fred C Pampel, Karl G Hill

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-Augmented Clearinghouse to Facilitate Evidence-Based Decision-Making and Social Spending: a Conceptual Framework.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Centering Community in Evidence-Based Prevention: Enhancing Evidence Criteria and Processes Across a State-Level Prevention System.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Advancing the implementation of evidence-based substance use prevention in Latin America: the Evidencia Viva program registry.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Racial and Ethnic Representation in Preventive Intervention Research: a Methodological Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Health promotion and disease prevention registries in the EU: a cross country comparison.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  8. Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clearinghouse Standards of Evidence on the Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility of Intervention Evaluations.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Implementing Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions During a Pandemic.Global implementation research and applications · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Common Methodological Problems in Randomized Controlled Trials of Preventive Interventions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pamela R BuckleyUniversity of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-3524
Abigail A FaganUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Fred C PampelUniversity of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
Karl G HillUniversity of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares prevention program registries in current use on their level of support for users seeking to implement evidence-based programs. Despite the importance of registries as intermediaries between researchers and the public, and although previous studies have examined how registries define their standards for methodological soundness and evidence of efficacy, little research has focused on the degree to which registries consider programs'

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineInformation DisseminationHumansPolicyRegistriesSurveys and Questionnairesdesign and evaluation of programs and policiesdissemination and implementationevidence-based programsprogram implementationscale-upsystematic review“What works” registries

Identifiers

PMID32588654
PMCPMC8022079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.