Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588508›Full record

ArticleBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2020

Scientists' warning on invasive alien species.

Petr Pyšek, Philip E Hulme, Dan Simberloff, Sven Bacher, Tim M Blackburn, James T Carlton, Wayne Dawson, Franz Essl, Llewellyn C Foxcroft, Piero Genovesi and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 368 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
368citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

368 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. BifunctionalACS omega · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Y-linked editors for invasive rodent control.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Prediction of the Potential Distribution ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Celtic Invasive Plants database.Scientific data · 2026
    Article

308 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Petr PyšekCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, CZ-252 43, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8500-442X
Philip E HulmeBio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5712-0474
Dan SimberloffDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-1424-9291
Sven BacherDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5147-7165
Tim M BlackburnCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0152-2663
James T CarltonMaritime Studies Program, Williams College - Mystic Seaport, 75 Greenmanville, Mystic, CT, 06355, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-3748-8893
Wayne DawsonDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3402-0774
Franz EsslCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8253-2112
Llewellyn C FoxcroftCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7071-6739
Piero GenovesiCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0262-1420
Jonathan M JeschkeLeibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 310, Berlin, 12587, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3328-4217
Ingolf KühnDepartment Community Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, Halle, 06120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-8249
Andrew M LiebholdUS Forest Service Northern Research Station, 180 Canfield St., Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-7427-6534
Nicholas E MandrakDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario, M1C 1A4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8335-9681
Laura A MeyersonDepartment of Natural Resources Science, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, 02881, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-1283-3865
Aníbal PauchardFacultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1284-3163
Jan PerglCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, CZ-252 43, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-1974
Helen E RoyU.K. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6050-679X
Hanno SeebensSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt am Main, 60325, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8993-6419
Mark van KleunenEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, Constance, 78457, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2861-3701
Montserrat VilàEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avd. Américo Vespucio 26, Isla de la Cartuja, Sevilla, 41092, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3171-8261
Michael J WingfieldForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9346-2009
David M RichardsonCentre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany & Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9574-8297

Funding

Akademie Věd České Republiky 67985939Austrian Science Foundation FWF I 3757-B29Belmont Forum 01LC1803A, 01LC1807B, PCI2018-092939Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 264740629Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG JE 288/9-2Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico AFB-170008German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01LC1803A, 01LC1807BGrantová Agentura České Republiky 19-28807XNancy Gore Hunger Professorship in Environmental Studies of the University of TennesseeNational Research Foundation of South Africa IFR2010041400019 and IFR160215158271Natural Environment Research Council NE/R016429/1Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31BD30_184114, and 31003A_179491USDA Forest Service EVA4.0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions are a global consequence of an increasingly connected world and the rise in human population size. The numbers of invasive alien species - the subset of alien species that spread widely in areas where they are not native, affecting the environment or human livelihoods - are increasing. Synergies with other global changes are exacerbating current invasions and facilitating new ones, thereby escalating the extent and impacts of invaders. Invasions have complex and often immense long-term direct and indirect impacts. In many cases, such impacts become apparent or problematic only when invaders are well established and have large ranges. Invasive alien species break down biogeographic realms, affect native species richness and abundance, increase the risk of native species extinction, affect the genetic composition of native populations, change native animal behaviour, alter phylogenetic diversity across communities, and modify trophic networks. Many invasive alien species also change ecosystem functioning and the delivery of ecosystem services by altering nutrient and contaminant cycling, hydrology, habitat structure, and disturbance regimes. These biodiversity and ecosystem impacts are accelerating and will increase further in the future. Scientific evidence has identified policy strategies to reduce future invasions, but these strategies are often insufficiently implemented. For some nations, notably Australia and New Zealand, biosecurity has become a national priority. There have been long-term successes, such as eradication of rats and cats on increasingly large islands and biological control of weeds across continental areas. However, in many countries, invasions receive little attention. Improved international cooperation is crucial to reduce the impacts of invasive alien species on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human livelihoods. Countries can strengthen their biosecurity regulations to implement and enforce more effective management strategies that should also address other global changes that interact with invasions.

Indexed as

EcosystemIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsBiodiversityPhylogenyPopulation DensityRatsbiological invasionsbiosecurityenvironmental impactsglobal changeinvasion dynamicsinvasion hotspotsnaturalizationpolicyprotected areassocioeconomic impacts

Identifiers

PMID32588508
PMCPMC7687187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.