Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588358›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2020

Estimating prevalence of endometritis in smallholder zero-grazed dairy cows in Rwanda.

Pascal Nyabinwa, Olivier Basole Kashongwe, Jean Paul Habimana, Claire d'Andre Hirwa, Bockline Omedo Bebe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Recent Trends inGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pascal NyabinwaDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Egerton University, P. O. Box 536, Njoro, 20115, Kenya.
Olivier Basole KashongweDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Egerton University, P. O. Box 536, Njoro, 20115, Kenya.
Jean Paul HabimanaSchool of Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Rwanda, P. O. Box 57, Nyagatare, Rwanda.
Claire d'Andre HirwaRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board, P. O. Box 5016, Kigali, Rwanda.
Bockline Omedo BebeDepartment of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Egerton University, P. O. Box 536, Njoro, 20115, Kenya. bbebe@egerton.ac.ke.
Egerton University · KERwanda Agriculture Board · RWUniversity of Rwanda · RW

Funding

United States Agency for International Development, as part of the Feed the Future initiative, under the CGIAR Fund BFS-G-11-00002 and EEM-G-00-04-00013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometritis is a postpartum uterine disease of cows that interrupts reproductive cycles resulting in suboptimal fertility, reduced performance and profitability of the dairy herd. The objective of the study was to estimate the perceived and observed prevalence of endometritis among zero-grazed dairy cows in smallholder farms in Rwanda. A snowball sampling method was applied in cross-sectional survey to obtain data from 370 farms on 466 cows within their 21-60 days postpartum (dpp). The survey, conducted from September 2018 to March 2019, simultaneously examined cows using the Metricheck Device (MED) to determine the presence and type of vaginal mucus (VMC) based on a score scale of 0 to 3. Cows scoring VMC ≥ 1 were recorded as clinical endometritis (CLE)-positive. Cytotape (CYT) was used to determine the percentages of polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) in endometrial cytology sample. Cows with ≥ 5% PMN were recorded subclinical endometritis (SCLE)-positive, whereas cows with VMC-0 and < 5% PMN were considered healthy cows. At cow-level, endometritis prevalence was 70.2% with 67.2% CLE and 31.8% SCLE while at the herd-level, prevalence was 71.1% with 68.1% CLE and 34.4% SCLE. The differences between the diagnostic performance of the MED and CYT were significant (p < 0.001). Perceived prevalence by farmers was much lower (3.2%) and without agreement with the observed prevalence (kappa = - 0.02, p > 0.05). The highly observed prevalence and farmer underestimation of endometritis prevalence indicate knowledge gaps about endometritis. The extension service therefore needs to increase awareness and education among smallholder farmers about detection and management of endometritis.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesEndometritisAnimalsCattleCross-Sectional StudiesDairyingFemalePostpartum PeriodPrevalenceRwandaCrossbredsCytotapeDairy cowsExotic breedsMetricheckRwanda

Identifiers

PMID32588358
OpenAlexW3037821861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.