ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022
A Qualitative Study to Explore Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on End-of-Life Patients' Dignity. How Can Dignity Be Defined, and Which Strategies Exist to Maintain Dignity?
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing nurses' and patients' perceptions of dignity in burn care: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Being Heard: A Qualitative Study of Lithuanian Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of Dignity at the End-of-Life.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Vulnerable Dignity, Dignified Vulnerability: Intertwining of Ethical Principles in End-of-Life Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dignity is a core topic within palliative care, and thus, it is important to get a detailed assessment of healthcare providers' (HCPs) perspectives on this subject. This study aimed to explore various HCPs' perspectives on end-of-life patients' dignity by collecting different testimonies about what dignity entails and which strategies HCPs use to maintain patients' dignity. A sample of 104 participants was interviewed using two open questions to collect qualitative data. Content analysis was performed to identify the central themes among answers. Regarding the first question ("What comes to your mind when I say "Dignity" in relation to your patients?"), nine themes emerged. The majority sampled stated that dignity means respecting the patient by considering him/her as a person in his/her entirety. Two other themes frequently emerged: "Respect the patient's will/wishes/needs" and "Self-determination/Self-expression." Concerning the second question ("Which strategies do you use to maintain patients' dignity?"), seven themes emerged. The "Caring skills" theme was most frequently identified, followed by "Empathic skills" and "Professional strategies." This study has enabled a better understanding of HCPs' perspectives on end-of-life patients' dignity. Through the interviews, HCPs were given an opportunity to reflect on dignity, possibly helping them improve their understanding of their patients' conditions and promote higher quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32588351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.