Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588289›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021

Validation of the adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score in a single centre cohort of APS patients from Turkey.

Ömer Uludağ, Murat Bektaş, Erhan Çene, Murat Sezer, Yasemin Şahinkaya, Ahmet Gül, Murat Inanç, Lale Öcal, Bahar Artim-Esen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ömer UludağDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Capa, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey. omeruludag15@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9928-7766
Murat BektaşDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Capa, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Erhan ÇeneDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Murat SezerDepartment of Cardiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yasemin ŞahinkayaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Capa, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet GülDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Capa, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Murat InançDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Capa, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Lale ÖcalDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Capa, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bahar Artim-EsenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Capa, Fatih, 34093, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome score (aGAPSS) is a recently developed thrombotic risk assessment score that considers the antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile and conventional cardiovascular risk factors. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the validity of the aGAPSS in predicting clinical manifestations (criteria and extra-criteria) of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in a single centre cohort of patients. Ninety-eight patients with APS ± systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were classified according to clinical manifestations as vascular thrombosis (VT), pregnancy morbidity (PM) or both (VT + PM). The aGAPSS was calculated for each patient as previously defined. Mean aGAPSS of the cohort was calculated as 10.2 ± 3.8. Significantly higher aGAPSS values were seen in VT (n = 58) and VT + PM (n = 29) groups when compared to PM (n = 11) group (10.6 ± 3.7 vs 7.4 ± 2.9, P = 0.005; 10.7 ± 4 vs 7.4 ± 2.9, P = 0.008, respectively), mainly due to lower frequencies of cardiovascular risk factors in PM. Higher aGAPPS values were also associated with recurrent thrombosis (11.6 ± 3.7 vs 9.9 ± 3.6, P = 0.04). Regarding extra-criteria manifestations, patients with livedo reticularis (n = 11) and APS nephropathy (n = 9) had significantly higher aGAPSS values (12.9 ± 3.4 vs 9.9 ± 3.7, P = 0.02; 12.4 ± 2.9 vs 10 ± 3.8, P = 0.04, respectively). The computed AUC demonstrated that aGAPSS values ≥10 had the best diagnostic accuracy for thrombosis. Our results suggest that patients with higher aGAPSS values are at higher risk for developing vascular thrombosis (either first event or recurrence) and extra-criteria manifestations, especially livedo reticularis and APS nephropathy.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAdultAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAntiphospholipid SyndromeFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesThrombosisTurkeyAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAdjusted global antiphospholipid syndrome scoreAntiphospholipid syndromeVascular thrombosis risk

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.