Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588257›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2021

Preferences and Acceptability of Vaginal Delivery Forms for HIV Prevention Among Women, Male Partners and Key Informants in South Africa and Zimbabwe: Qualitative Findings.

Petina Musara, Cecilia Milford, Mary Kate Shapley-Quinn, Rachel Weinrib, Prisca Mutero, Enyonam Odoom, Nyaradzo M Mgodi, Zvavahera M Chirenje, Homaira Hanif, Meredith R Clark and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06046053 (MATRIX-002), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06046053 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

MATRIX-002: Trial to Assess Acceptability and Safety of Two Placebo Prototype Vaginal Films

TypeinterventionalSponsorRohan, Lisa, PhDRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsSafety, Acceptability, UsabilityArmsPlacebo Vaginal Film with Square Corners, Placebo Vaginal Film with Rounded Corners
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hydrogels for Mucosal Drug Delivery.ACS applied bio materials · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Petina MusaraUniversity of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences-Clinical Trials Research Centre, 15 Phillips Avenue, Belgravia, Harare, Zimbabwe. pmusara@uzchs-ctrc.org.
Cecilia MilfordMRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Mary Kate Shapley-QuinnWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rachel WeinribWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Prisca MuteroUniversity of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences-Clinical Trials Research Centre, 15 Phillips Avenue, Belgravia, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Enyonam OdoomWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nyaradzo M MgodiUniversity of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences-Clinical Trials Research Centre, 15 Phillips Avenue, Belgravia, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Zvavahera M ChirenjeUniversity of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences-Clinical Trials Research Centre, 15 Phillips Avenue, Belgravia, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Homaira HanifEastern Virginia Medical School, CONRAD, Arlington, VA, USA.
Meredith R ClarkEastern Virginia Medical School, CONRAD, Arlington, VA, USA.
Jenni SmitMRU (MatCH Research Unit), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Ariane van der StratenWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Elizabeth T MontgomeryWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Quatro Study Team

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation GSB-S-15-001USAID AID-0AA-A-14-00010USAID AID-OAA-A-14-00010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The attributes of an HIV microbicide may affect its acceptability, uptake and use. Quatro, a clinical study with a qualitative component, was conducted to elicit input from end-users and key informants (KIs) on four different placebo vaginal microbicide delivery forms; fast dissolving insert, ring, film and gel. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with young women, their male partners and KIs, to explore acceptability and preferences of the four placebo products, with the intention of improving product attributes, adherence, and consequently, long term effectiveness. None of the four microbicide delivery forms stood well above others as the most preferred. Product attributes; long-action, ease of use, invisibility, female initiated and non-interference during sex were favourable in both countries. Despite preference for the long-action, on-demand products were the most liked by women. Qualitative data from the Quatro study provided rich feedback on specific attributes important to the acceptability of four HIV prevention product platforms currently in development, enabling more informed and guided product development efforts moving forward.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsHIV InfectionsAdministration, IntravaginalDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSexual PartnersSouth AfricaZimbabweAntiviral AgentsBarriersFacilitatorsHIV preventionsub-Saharan AfricaVaginal microbicide delivery forms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.