Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588233›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Unplanned return to operation room (OR) following growing spinal constructs (GSCs) in early onset scoliosis (EOS)-a multi-centric study.

Saumyajit Basu, Anil M Solanki, Abhishek Srivastava, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, S Rajasekaran, Arvind Jayaswal

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current benchtop protocols are not appropriate for the evaluation of distraction-based growing rods: a literature review to justify a new protocol and its development.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saumyajit BasuPark Clinic, 4, Gorky Terrace, Minto park, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India.
Anil M SolankiPark Clinic, 4, Gorky Terrace, Minto park, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017, India. dr.anilsolanki89@gmail.com.
Abhishek SrivastavaPrimus Super-Speciality Hospital, Chandragupta Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, 110 021, India.
Ajoy Prasad ShettyGanga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road,, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 043, India.
S RajasekaranGanga Medical Centre & Hospitals Pvt Ltd, 313, Mettupalayam Road,, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 043, India.
Arvind JayaswalPrimus Super-Speciality Hospital, Chandragupta Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi, 110 021, India.
BLK Super Speciality Hospital · INGanga Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the incidence and risk factors associated with the unplanned return to OR in EOS.

methodsMedical records of 51 patients of EOS operated at three different centres using various types of GSCs were evaluated for complications requiring unplanned surgeries. Data were analysed to find out rate of unplanned surgeries in relation to the aetiology, age and Cobb angle at index surgery, type of implant, cause of unplanned surgery, and management required.

resultsOut of 51 patients, three did not meet inclusion criteria. Forty-eight patients of EOS operated by GSCs with a mean age of 6.7 years (range 2-12 years) with an average follow-up of 67.3 months were studied. There were 30 congenital, 10 idiopathic, 4 syndromic, and 4 neuromuscular cases. Thirty-nine out of 48 patients had one or more unplanned surgeries on follow-up (81.25%). Out of total 248 surgeries following index procedure, 82 were unplanned surgeries (33.06%), including 53 implant revisions, 12 implant-removal, 14 debridement, and 2 flaps. The common complications were 24.14% rod/screw breakage, 42.53% anchor pull-out, 16.09% infections, 6.90% wound dehiscence, and 4.6% neuro deficits. Unplanned surgeries were significantly higher in syndromic (58.8%) and neuromuscular (52.9%) than congenital (27.2%) and idiopathic (37.8%) cases (p < 0.05). Age at index procedure < 5 years had higher unplanned surgeries than age > 5 years (2.5 and 1.23 per patient, respectively,  p < 0.05). Type of implant and initial Cobb angle did not significantly affect the rate of unplanned surgeries (p  > 0.05)

conclusionGSCs in EOS require a frequent revisit to operation room which should be well understood by the surgeon and parents.

Indexed as

ScoliosisSpinal FusionChildChild, PreschoolFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantPostoperative ComplicationsProstheses and ImplantsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpineEarly onset scoliosisGrowing spinal constructsOperation roomUnplanned return

Identifiers

PMID32588233
OpenAlexW3037924635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.