ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Gadoxetate-enhanced abbreviated MRI is highly accurate for hepatocellular carcinoma screening.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Contrast MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Inter-reader agreement of abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Pooled it
- The Use of Non-Contrast Abbreviated MRI for the Detection of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Postoperative Surveillance.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Comparison of Annual Dynamic Abbreviated MRI and Biannual Ultrasound for HCC Surveillance in a High-Risk Group: Two-Center Cohort Study.Liver cancer · 2026Article
- Deep learning for automatic detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Comparison of abbreviated MRI and ultrasonography in the detection of early hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: a health economic evaluation.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Review
- Practice changing RCT design and rationale: Abbreviated MRI plus AFPJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Review
- Improving risk stratification and detection of early HCC using ultrasound-based deep learning models.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- Current State of Evidence for Use of MRI in LI-RADS.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Prediction of therapeutic response to transarterial chemoembolization plus systemic therapy regimen in hepatocellular carcinoma using pretreatment contrast-enhanced MRI based habitat analysis and Crossformer model.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Comparison of abbreviated and complete MRI protocols for treatment response assessment of colorectal liver metastases.European radiology · 2025Article
- Abbreviated MRI-Based Surveillance Strategies for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Patient centered HCC surveillance - complementary roles of ultrasound and CT/MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Deep learning empowered gadolinium-free contrast-enhanced abbreviated MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Accelerated Non-Contrast Abbreviated Liver MRI for Detecting Malignant Focal Hepatic Lesions: Dual-Center Validation.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) contrast-enhanced abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in at-risk patients: a multi-center study in China.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- LI-RADS: Current Status and Future Directions.Korean journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe primary objective was to compare the performance of 3 different abbreviated MRI (AMRI) sets extracted from a complete gadoxetate-enhanced MRI obtained for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. Secondary objective was to perform a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing each AMRI set to published ultrasound performance for HCC screening in the USA.
methodsThis retrospective study included 237 consecutive patients (M/F, 146/91; mean age, 58 years) with chronic liver disease who underwent a complete gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for HCC screening in 2017 in a single institution. Two radiologists independently reviewed 3 AMRI sets extracted from the complete exam: non-contrast (NC-AMRI: T2-weighted imaging (T2wi)+diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)), dynamic-AMRI (Dyn-AMRI: T2wi+DWI+dynamic T1wi), and hepatobiliary phase AMRI (HBP-AMRI: T2wi+DWI+T1wi during the HBP). Each patient was classified as HCC-positive/HCC-negative based on the reference standard, which consisted in all available patient data. Diagnostic performance for HCC detection was compared between sets. Estimated set characteristics, including historical ultrasound data, were incorporated into a microsimulation model for cost-effectiveness analysis.
resultsThe reference standard identified 13/237 patients with HCC (prevalence, 5.5%; mean size, 33.7 ± 30 mm). Pooled sensitivities were 61.5% for NC-AMRI (95% confidence intervals, 34.4-83%), 84.6% for Dyn-AMRI (60.8-95.1%), and 80.8% for HBP-AMRI (53.6-93.9%), without difference between sets (p range, 0.06-0.16). Pooled specificities were 95.5% (92.4-97.4%), 99.8% (98.4-100%), and 94.9% (91.6-96.9%), respectively, with a significant difference between Dyn-AMRI and the other sets (p < 0.01). All AMRI methods were effective compared with ultrasound, with life-year gain of 3-12 months against incremental costs of US$ < 12,000.
conclusionsNC-AMRI has limited sensitivity for HCC detection, while HBP-AMRI and Dyn-AMRI showed excellent sensitivity and specificity, the latter being slightly higher for Dyn-AMRI. Cost-effectiveness estimates showed that AMRI is effective compared with ultrasound. KEY POINTS: • Comparison of different abbreviated MRI (AMRI) sets reconstructed from a complete gadoxetate MRI demonstrated that non-contrast AMRI has low sensitivity (61.5%) compared with contrast-enhanced AMRI (80.8% for hepatobiliary phase AMRI and 84.6% for dynamic AMRI), with all sets having high specificity. • Non-contrast and hepatobiliary phase AMRI can be performed in less than 14 min (including set-up time), while dynamic AMRI can be performed in less than 17 min. • All AMRI sets were cost-effective for HCC screening in at-risk population in comparison with ultrasound.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.