Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588206›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

The impact of phone counseling on urinary stone prevention.

Amihay Nevo, Karen L Stern, Jonathan P Moore, Mitchell R Humphreys, Mark D Tyson, Mira T Keddis

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amihay NevoDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA. amihaynevo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8786-181X
Karen L SternDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.
Jonathan P MooreDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.
Mitchell R HumphreysDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.
Mark D TysonDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.
Mira T KeddisDepartment of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, USA.
WinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe compared the effect of standard office-based consultation (OC) and phone correspondences (PC) on dietary 24-h urinary parameters.

methodsThe medical record of all patients treated between January and April 2019 was reviewed. Only patients who had at least two consecutive 24-h urine collections were included. Linear and logistic regressions were used to investigate the difference between the changes in urinary parameters after OC and PC.

resultsForty-three patients underwent 135 OC and 34 PC. Twenty-one received OC and PC, and 22 had only OC. Gender, age, the distance to stone clinic, the number of previous stone episodes, and baseline urinary parameters were similar between the groups. Patients who had both OC and PC had a longer follow-up time (51.7 vs 18.5 months, p < 0.0001) as well as more consults (Median 5.4 vs 2.5, p < 0.0001). Six (27%) patients who had only OC, and eight (38%) patients who had both OC and PC, experienced stone recurrence during the study period (p = 0.52). Following PC, there was a greater improvement in urine volume in comparison to OC (0.27 l/day vs -0.06 l/day, p = 0.034), but there was no difference in the absolute values after the consults between the groups.

conclusionIn established stone-clinic patients, PC was associated with a better adherence with follow-up. The 24-h urine results were similar between PC and OC. PC may be an effective alternative for urinary stone management.

Indexed as

Directive CounselingDistance CounselingTelephoneFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUrinary Calculi24-h urine collectionKidney stonesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32588206
OpenAlexW3037671269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.