Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588194›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2020

Acute cardiovascular response to unilateral, bilateral, and alternating resistance exercise with blood flow restriction.

Daphney M Stanford, Joonsun Park, Raymond Jones, Daniel P Credeur, Stephanie McCoy, Matthew B Jessee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daphney M StanfordApplied Human Health and Physical Function Laboratory, Department of Health, Exercise Science, Recreation and Sports Management, The University of Mississippi, 215 Turner Center, University, MS, 38677, USA.
Joonsun ParkSchool of Kinesiology and Nutrition, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Raymond JonesSchool of Kinesiology and Nutrition, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Daniel P CredeurSchool of Kinesiology and Nutrition, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Stephanie McCoySchool of Kinesiology and Nutrition, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Matthew B JesseeApplied Human Health and Physical Function Laboratory, Department of Health, Exercise Science, Recreation and Sports Management, The University of Mississippi, 215 Turner Center, University, MS, 38677, USA. mbjessee@olemiss.edu.
University of Southern Mississippi · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimBlood flow restriction (BFR) exercise is a common alternative to traditional high-load resistance exercise used to increase muscle size and strength. Some populations utilizing BFR at a low load may wish to limit their cardiovascular response to exercise. Different contraction patterns may attenuate the cardiovascular response, but this has not been compared using BFR. PURPOSE: To compare the cardiovascular response to unilateral (UNI), bilateral (BIL), and alternating (ALT) BFR exercise contraction patterns.

methodsTwenty healthy participants performed four sets (30 s rest) of knee extensions to failure, using 30% one-repetition maximum, 40% arterial occlusion pressure, and each of the three contraction patterns (on different days, at the same time of day, separated by 2-10 days, randomized). Cardiovascular responses, presented as pre- to post-exercise mean changes (SD), were measured using pulse wave analysis and analyzed with Bayesian RMANOVA.

resultsALT caused greater changes in: aortic systolic [ΔmmHg: ALT = 21(8); UNI = 13(11); BIL = 15(8); BF

conclusionThose at risk of a cardiovascular event may choose unilateral or bilateral BFR exercise over alternating until further work determines the degree to which it can be tolerated.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAdultCompression BandagesExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansIschemic PreconditioningLegMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalRandom AllocationRegional Blood FlowResistance TrainingArterial stiffnessHemodynamicsKAATSUPulse wave analysisResistance trainingVenous occlusion

Identifiers

PMID32588194
OpenAlexW3037773146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.