Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32588090›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Clinical value of negative

M Celli, U De Giorgi, P Caroli, V Di Iorio, L Fantini, V Rossetti, F Foca, S Nicolini, M Giganti, G Paganelli and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Update on PSMA-based Prostate Cancer Imaging.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Prognostic significance of a negative PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Event-free survival afterEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Diagnostic value ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  10. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M CelliNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
U De GiorgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
P CaroliNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
V Di IorioOncology Pharmacy, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
L FantiniNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
V RossettiNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
F FocaUnit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
S NicoliniNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
M GigantiDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
G PaganelliNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy. giovanni.paganelli@irst.emr.it.
F MatteucciNuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro IG 20476Ministero della Salute RF-2016-02364230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the clinical value of

methodsOne hundred three BCR patients (median age, 70 years; median PSA, 0.47 ng/mL) with negative

resultsIn 57 patients out of 103 (55.3%), CR was detected in the prostatic fossa (45.6%), nodes (38.6%), and bone (15.8%). The median CRFS was 15.4 months (range, 12.1-20.5), with a CRFS at 12 months in 61.4% of cases (range, 50.9-70.4) whereas the 24-month CRFS was 34.8% (range, 24-45.8). ISUP subset 1 benefited from significantly longer CRFS compared to subset 2 and subset 3 (median CRFS, 20.5 months, 12.6 months, and 12.1 months, respectively). ISUP subset 3 had significantly poorer 24-month CRFS (9.3%) compared to subset 1 (47.8%) and subset 2 (33.5%). At the univariate and multivariate analyses, the ISUP subset was the only significant risk factor for clinical relapse; ISUP subset 3 and subset 2 patients held a higher risk of CR compared to subset 1 patients (HR of 2.75 [1.35-5.57] for subset 3 versus subset 1; HR of 2.08 [1.11-3.88] for subset 2 versus subset 1).

conclusion

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOligopeptidesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptides68Ga-PSMA PET/CTBiochemical recurrenceNegative PSMAProstate cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.