Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32587736›Full record

ArticleNursing open2020

Invisible population: Understanding recruitment barriers of a nurse-led support programme for families with caregiving children in Austria.

Martin Nagl-Cupal, Julia Hauprich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin Nagl-CupalDepartment of Nursing Science University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2414-3463
Julia HauprichDepartment of Nursing Science University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate why no families could be recruited for a nurse-led and family-centred support programme in Austria which aimed to prevent an age-inappropriate caring role for young carers. Design: A qualitative study incorporating qualitative e-interviews and telephone interviews. Method: Twenty-one interviews were conducted with statistically significant project stakeholders ( Results: The lack of awareness towards young carers, the unfamiliar, open outcome approach of the intervention, the inappropriate language used in promotional materials and the families' fear of stigma while seeking support were identified as central obstacles for successful recruitment of families and implementation of the support programme.

Indexed as

FamilyNurse's RoleAdultAustriaCaregiversChildHumansQualitative Researchevaluation of servicesfamily caregivingfamily supportqualitative researchrecruitment barriersyoung carers

Identifiers

PMID32587736
PMCPMC7308670
OpenAlexW3016947274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.