Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32587717›Full record

ArticleNursing open2020

Back to school with telepresence robot technology: A qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment.

Mette Weibel, Martin Kaj Fridh Nielsen, Martha Krogh Topperzer, Nanna Maria Hammer, Sarah Wagn Møller, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Hanne Bækgaard Larsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mette WeibelPediatric Oncology Research Laboratory Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine The Juliane Marie Center University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1810-2334
Martin Kaj Fridh NielsenPediatric Oncology Research Laboratory Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine The Juliane Marie Center University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) Copenhagen Denmark.
Martha Krogh TopperzerPediatric Oncology Research Laboratory Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine The Juliane Marie Center University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) Copenhagen Denmark.
Nanna Maria HammerPediatric Oncology Research Laboratory Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine The Juliane Marie Center University Hospital (Rigshospitalet) Copenhagen Denmark.
Sarah Wagn MøllerDanish School of Education (DPU) Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark.
Kjeld SchmiegelowDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Rigshospitalet University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark.
Hanne Bækgaard LarsenPediatric Oncology Research Laboratory Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Rigshospitalet University Hospital of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To explore how an AV1 telepresence robot helps school-aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during cancer treatment. Design: Qualitative pilot study. Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with school-aged children and adolescents ( Results: Five themes emerged: expectations, sociality, learning, spatiality and technology. Participants experienced the robots as facilitating social interaction processes with classmates and inclusion in learning activities, reducing their sense of loneliness and lacking behind educationally. Nevertheless, multiple factors determine whether the robot is perceived as exclusive, including the technical functionality of the robot, spatiality in the classroom and mutual expectations of the parties involved.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRoboticsAdolescentChildHumansPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchSchoolsSocial Behaviorcancerchildhood illnesseducationschool nursingtechnology

Identifiers

PMID32587717
PMCPMC7308694
OpenAlexW3011556072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.