ArticleSAGE open medicine2020
Analysis of the impact of secondary prophylaxis on
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06979609 (Secondary Prophylaxis of Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infections During Systemic Antibiotics With Vancomycin), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Secondary Prophylaxis of Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infections During Systemic Antibiotics With Vancomycin: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral Vancomycin for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Strategies to preventInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction
objectivesTo determine whether critically ill adults receiving low-dose per os vancomycin for secondary
methodsThis was a retrospective, two-center, observational study in a large academic medical center and affiliated community hospital. Included patients had a history of
resultsEighty-two patients were included: 38 control (46.3%), 20 metronidazole (24.4%), 17 vancomycin (20.7%), and 7 combination (8.5%). Ten of 82 patients (12.2%) had at least one
conclusionThere was no difference in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.