Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32587647›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2020

Using RNA-Seq to Explore the Repair Mechanism of the Three Methods and Three-Acupoint Technique on DRGs in Sciatic Nerve Injured Rats.

Tao-Tao Lv, Yan-Jun Mo, Tian-Yuan Yu, Shuai Shao, Meng-Qian Lu, Yu-Ting Luo, Yi Shen, Yu-Mo Zhang, Wong Steven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Application of traditional Chinese therapy in sports medicine.Sports medicine and health science · 2021
    Review
  15. A Review on the Mechanism of Tuina Promoting the Recovery of Peripheral Nerve Injury.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tao-Tao LvSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6838-3851
Yan-Jun MoSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Tian-Yuan YuSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2089-3101
Shuai ShaoSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meng-Qian LuSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yu-Ting LuoSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yi ShenSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yu-Mo ZhangSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wong StevenSchool of Acupuncture, Moxibustion and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To study the effects of the three methods and three-acupoint technique on DRG gene expression in SNI model rats and to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the three methods and three-acupoint technique on promoting recovery in peripheral nerve injury. Methods: 27 male SD rats were randomly divided into three groups: a Sham group, the SNI group, and the Tuina group. The Tuina group was treated with a tuina manipulation simulator to simulate massage on points, controlling for both quality and quantity. Point-pressing, plucking, and kneading methods were administered quantitatively at Yinmen (BL37), Chengshan (BL57), and Yanglingquan (GB34) points on the affected side once a day, beginning 7 days after modeling. Intervention was applied once a day for 10 days, then 1 day of rest, followed by 10 more days of intervention, totally equaling 20 times of intervention. The effect of the three methods and three-point technique on the recovery of injured rats was evaluated using behavior analysis. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis of differentially expressed genes in DRGs of the three groups of rats was also performed. GO and KEGG enrichment was analyzed and verified using real-time PCR. Results: RNA-Seq combined with database information showed that the number of differentially expressed genes in DRG was the largest in the Tuina group compared with the SNI group, totaling 226. GO function is enriched in the positive regulation of cell processes, ion binding, protein binding, neuron, response to pressure, response to metal ions, neuron projection, and other biological processes. GO function is also enriched in the Wnt, IL-17, and MAPK signaling pathways in the KEGG database. PCR results were consistent with those of RNA sequencing, suggesting that the results of transcriptome sequencing were reliable. Conclusion: The three methods and three-acupoint technique can promote the recovery of SNI model rats by altering the gene sequence in DRGs.

Indexed as

Acupuncture PointsDiagnosis-Related GroupsMedicine, Chinese TraditionalPeripheral Nerve InjuriesTherapy, Soft TissueAnimalsMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySciatic NerveSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID32587647
PMCPMC7298348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.