Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32587551›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Proof of Concept of a Gamified DEvelopmental Assessment on an E-Platform (DEEP) Tool to Measure Cognitive Development in Rural Indian Preschool Children.

Debarati Mukherjee, Supriya Bhavnani, Akshay Swaminathan, Deepali Verma, Dhanya Parameshwaran, Gauri Divan, Jayashree Dasgupta, Kamalkant Sharma, Tara C Thiagarajan, Vikram Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Progress and Potential.Current directions in psychological science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Promoting Developmental Potential in Early Childhood: A Global Framework for Health and Education.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Debarati MukherjeeCentre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India.
Supriya BhavnaniCentre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India.
Akshay SwaminathanDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Deepali VermaChild Development Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Dhanya ParameshwaranSapien Labs, Arlington, VA, United States.
Gauri DivanChild Development Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Jayashree DasguptaChild Development Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Kamalkant SharmaChild Development Group, Sangath, Goa, India.
Tara C ThiagarajanSapien Labs, Arlington, VA, United States.
Vikram PatelCentre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram, India.
Sangath · INHarvard Global Health Institute · USPublic Health Foundation of India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 250 million children in developing countries are at risk of not achieving their developmental potential, and unlikely to receive timely interventions because existing developmental assessments that help identify children who are faltering are prohibitive for use in low resource contexts. To bridge this "detection gap," we developed a tablet-based, gamified cognitive assessment tool named DEvelopmental assessment on an E-Platform (DEEP), which is feasible for delivery by non-specialists in rural Indian households and acceptable to all end-users. Here we provide proof-of-concept of using a supervised machine learning (ML) approach benchmarked to the Bayley's Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition (BSID-III) cognitive scale, to predict a child's cognitive development using metrics derived from gameplay on DEEP. Two-hundred children aged 34-40 months recruited from rural Haryana, India were concurrently assessed using DEEP and BSID-III. Seventy percent of the sample was used for training the ML algorithms using a 10-fold cross validation approach and ensemble modeling, while 30% was assigned to the "test" dataset to evaluate the algorithm's accuracy on novel data. Of the 522 features that computationally described children's performance on DEEP, 31 features which together represented all nine games of DEEP were selected in the final model. The predicted DEEP scores were in good agreement (ICC [2,1] > 0.6) and positively correlated (Pearson's

Indexed as

cognitive developmentdigital assessmentLMICmachine learningmHealthpreschool childrenscalableserious game

Identifiers

PMID32587551
PMCPMC7299081
OpenAlexW3034802098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.