Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32587286›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Induced tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses of broccoli and Arabidopsis after treatment with elicitor molecules.

Jhon Venegas-Molina, Silvia Proietti, Jacob Pollier, Wilson Orozco-Freire, Darío Ramirez-Villacis, Antonio Leon-Reyes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Study ofBiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Oxidative Status ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Jhon Venegas-MolinaLaboratorio de Biotecnología Agrícola y de Alimentos-Ingeniería en Agronomía, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías El Politécnico, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Campus Cumbayá, 17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador.
Silvia ProiettiPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science4Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jacob PollierGhent University, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
Wilson Orozco-FreireLaboratorio de Biotecnología Agrícola y de Alimentos-Ingeniería en Agronomía, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías El Politécnico, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Campus Cumbayá, 17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador.
Darío Ramirez-VillacisLaboratorio de Biotecnología Agrícola y de Alimentos-Ingeniería en Agronomía, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías El Politécnico, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Campus Cumbayá, 17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador.
Antonio Leon-ReyesLaboratorio de Biotecnología Agrícola y de Alimentos-Ingeniería en Agronomía, Colegio de Ciencias e Ingenierías El Politécnico, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Campus Cumbayá, 17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador. aleon@usfq.edu.ec.
Universidad San Francisco de Quito · ECGhent University · BEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) regulate defense mechanisms capable of overcoming different plant stress conditions and constitute distinct but interconnected signaling pathways. Interestingly, several other molecules are reported to trigger stress-specific defense responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. In this study, we investigated the effect of 14 elicitors against diverse but pivotal types of abiotic (drought) and biotic (the chewing insect Ascia monuste, the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae DC 3000 and the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria alternata) stresses on broccoli and Arabidopsis. Among the main findings, broccoli pre-treated with SA and chitosan showed the highest drought stress recovery in a dose-dependent manner. Several molecules led to increased drought tolerance over a period of three weeks. The enhanced drought tolerance after triggering the SA pathway was associated with stomata control. Moreover, methyl jasmonate (MeJA) reduced A. monuste insect development and plant damage, but unexpectedly, other elicitors increased both parameters. GUS reporter assays indicated expression of the SA-dependent PR1 gene in plants treated with nine elicitors, whereas the JA-dependent LOX2 gene was only expressed upon MeJA treatment. Overall, elicitors capable of tackling drought and biotrophic pathogens mainly triggered the SA pathway, but adversely also induced systemic susceptibility to chewing insects. These findings provide directions for potential future in-depth characterization and utilization of elicitors and induced resistance in plant protection.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceAcetatesAlternariaAnimalsArabidopsisBrassicaButterfliesCyclopentanesDroughtsGene Expression Regulation, PlantOxylipinsPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPseudomonas syringaeSalicylic AcidAcetatesCyclopentanesmethyl jasmonateOxylipinsPlant ProteinsSalicylic Acid

Identifiers

PMID32587286
PMCPMC7316721
OpenAlexW3037924784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.