Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32586879›Full record

ReviewThe European respiratory journal2020

Anti-alarmins in asthma: targeting the airway epithelium with next-generation biologics.

Celeste M Porsbjerg, Asger Sverrild, Clare M Lloyd, Andrew N Menzies-Gow, Elisabeth H Bel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The European respiratory journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Celeste M PorsbjergDept of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Celeste.Porsbjerg@regionh.dk.
Asger SverrildDept of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Clare M LloydNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8977-6726
Andrew N Menzies-GowRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Elisabeth H BelDept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKImperial College London · GBRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibody therapies have significantly improved treatment outcomes for patients with severe asthma; however, a significant disease burden remains. Available biologic treatments, including anti-immunoglobulin (Ig)E, anti-interleukin (IL)-5, anti-IL-5Rα and anti-IL-4Rα, reduce exacerbation rates in study populations by approximately 50% only. Furthermore, there are currently no effective treatments for patients with severe, type 2-low asthma. Existing biologics target immunological pathways that are downstream in the type 2 inflammatory cascade, which may explain why exacerbations are only partly abrogated. For example, type 2 airway inflammation results from several inflammatory signals in addition to IL-5. Clinically, this can be observed in how fractional exhaled nitric oxide (

Indexed as

AsthmaBiological ProductsAlarminsCytokinesEosinophilsEpitheliumHumansAlarminsBiological ProductsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID32586879
PMCPMC7676874
OpenAlexW3037594491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.