Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32586847›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Sam D Heraghty, John M Sutton, Meaghan L Pimsler, Janna L Fierst, James P Strange, Jeffrey D Lozier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Museum genomics suggests long-term population decline in a putatively extinct bumble bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sam D HeraghtyDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL sdheraghty@crimson.ua.edu jlozier@ua.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2364-5771
John M SuttonDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-3559-389X
Meaghan L PimslerDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Janna L FierstDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-8829
James P StrangeDepartment of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Jeffrey D LozierDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-5640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bumble bees are ecologically and economically important insect pollinators. Three abundant and widespread species in western North America,

Indexed as

EcologyAnimalsBeesNorth AmericaUnited StatesBombus bifariusBombus vancouverensisBombus vosnesenskiihybrid assemblyIlluminaMaSuRCAOxford Nanopore Technologies

Identifiers

PMID32586847
PMCPMC7407468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.