Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32586345›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2020

Investigation of Atyp.C using UF-5000 flow cytometer in patients with a suspected diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma: a single-center study.

Chunyun Ren, Xing Wang, Chunwei Yang, Shengchao Li, Shuangchun Liu, Hongcui Cao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of the fully automated urine particle analyzer UF-1500.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunyun RenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou City, 310003, China.
Xing WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou City, 310003, China.
Chunwei YangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou City, 310003, China.
Shengchao LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou City, 310003, China.
Shuangchun LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou City, 310003, China.
Hongcui CaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou City, 310003, China. hccao@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6604-6867
Zhejiang University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2012ZX10002004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the predictive power of Atyp.C (a parameter of UF-5000 flow cytometer) for patients with a suspected diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma.

methodsWe analyzed 163 urine specimens from 128 patients with suspected urothelial carcinoma using a fully automated fluorescence flow cytometry analyzer (UF-5000) and evaluated its performance on identifying atypical/malignant urothelial cells. From January 1, 2019 to April 4, 2019, all consecutive specimens for urinary cytopathology were enrolled.

resultsOf the specimens with urinary cytopathology, 67 specimens (41.1%) revealed abnormal findings in cytology analysis. Among them, 20 specimens (12.3%) were diagnosed as atypical urothelial cells, 26 specimens (16.0%) as suspicious for malignancy (S-malignancy), and 21 specimens (12.9%) as confirmed malignancy. The UF-5000 findings were positive in 59 specimens (36.2%); therefore, the agreement with cytopathology was 73.0%. Using follow-up histologic diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma with or without urinary tract cytology (UTCy) as a reference standard (suspicious and confirmed malignancy were the positive criteria for UTCy), the sensitivity was 59.0%, specificity was 82.1%, positive predictive value was 75.0%, negative predictive value was 68.8%, and the agreement was 71.1%.

conclusionsIt is worth knowing and reporting that the Atyp.C assay may be used as an accessory test for patients with suspected urothelial carcinoma, based on its ability to identify high-risk patients who might need closer follow-up or additional medical treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Transitional CellCytodiagnosisFemaleFlow CytometryHumansMaleMiddle AgedUrinalysisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsYoung AdultAtyp.C parameterUF-5000; urothelial carcinomaUrinalysis

Identifiers

PMID32586345
PMCPMC7318455
OpenAlexW3037777401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.