Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32586210›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychosocial oncology

Perceived importance of affective forecasting in cancer treatment decision making.

Laura M Perry, Michael Hoerger, Brittany D Korotkin, Paul R Duberstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychosocial oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura M PerryDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6144-6266
Michael HoergerDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Brittany D KorotkinDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9967-4360
Paul R DubersteinDepartment of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6882-0898
Tulane University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Leigh Lamonica · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Xavier RCMI Renewal Application-Research Infrastructure CoreU54MD007595 · NIMHD · XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Thomas Wiese · 2019 to 2026
$41.9M
NIMH INSTITUTIONAL NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARDT32MH018911 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CAINE, ERIC D. · 1988 to 2012
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007595NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine whether adults with cancer view affective forecasting as important for treatment decisions, and to examine these perceptions among key subgroups.

designAdults with cancer (

findingsMost participants (89.6%) identified affective forecasting as important for treatment decisions. Affective forecasting was more likely to be rated as important among patients with prostate cancer (

Indexed as

AffectDecision MakingForecastingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsYoung AdultCancerdecision makingemotionsforecastingneuroticismoncologypersonality

Identifiers

PMID32586210
PMCPMC7928208
OpenAlexW3037639541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.