Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32586062›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Understanding the Barriers and Opportunities for Effective Management of Shared Sanitation in Low-Income Settlements-The Case of Kumasi, Ghana.

Prince Antwi-Agyei, Bismark Dwumfour-Asare, Kwaku Amaning Adjei, Raphael Kweyu, Sheillah Simiyu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Shared but Clean Household Toilets: What Makes This Possible? Evidence from Ghana and Kenya.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Prince Antwi-AgyeiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Energy and Natural Resources (UENR), Regional Centre of Energy and Environmental Sustainability (RCEES), P.O. Box 214, Sunyani BS0061, Ghana.
Bismark Dwumfour-AsareDepartment of Environmental Health & Sanitation Education, University of Education Winneba, Asante-Mampong Campus, P. O. Box 40, Asante-Mampong AM0013, Ghana.
Kwaku Amaning AdjeiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Regional Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre (RWESCK), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), PMB, University Post Office, Kumasi AK448, Ghana.
Raphael KweyuDepartment of Geography, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Sheillah SimiyuUrbanisation and Well-being Unit, African Population & Health Research Center, P.O Box 10787, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
African Population and Health Research Center · KEKenyatta University · KEKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHUniversity of Education, Winneba · GHUniversity of Energy and Natural Resources · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved sanitation for all is a daunting task for low-income countries, and shared toilets often provide an alternative to private household sanitation for most urban residents. This study sought to provide better understanding of the existing barriers and opportunities for improved management of shared sanitation. The study used focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with 70 users (landlords and tenants) of shared sanitation in Kumasi, Ghana to assess barriers and opportunities of "high-quality" shared sanitation. The commonly used toilet facilities were dry toilets-Kumasi Ventilated Improved Pit latrine and Ventilated Improved Pit latrines; and flush systems-water closet and pour flush connected to septic tanks. Between 2 and 21 households, or 4 and 84 people, shared one facility. Participants' description of "high-quality" (Ideal) shared sanitation was centred on cleanliness, user behaviour, smell, and user crowding. They also identified challenges of shared sanitation as overcrowded users, poor user behaviours, conflicts among users, and high cost associated with frequent desludging. However, opportunities for improvement included users' preference for shared toilets due to enjoyed benefits, existing facility management practices, and mutual understanding among users (tenants and landlords). Interventions and policy guidelines to influence behaviour change of shared sanitation users are proposed and are intended to be delivered by local government and users.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPoverty AreasSanitationToilet FacilitiesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFocus GroupsGhanaHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchBarriersbehaviour changecompoundGhanaO&Mshared toilet

Identifiers

PMID32586062
PMCPMC7345014
OpenAlexW3035821841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.