Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32585961›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Effect of Washing, Waxing and Low-Temperature Storage on the Postharvest Microbiome of Apple.

Ahmed Abdelfattah, Susan R Whitehead, Dumitru Macarisin, Jia Liu, Erik Burchard, Shiri Freilich, Christopher Dardick, Samir Droby, Michael Wisniewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Study on the Application of COFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ahmed AbdelfattahInstitute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 12, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6090-7200
Susan R WhiteheadDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 220 Ag Quad Ln, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7089-4594
Dumitru MacarisinU.S. Food and Drug Administration, 501 Campus Drive, College Park, MD 20740, USA.
Jia LiuChongqing Key Laboratory of Economic Plant Biotechnology, College of Landscape Architecture and Life Sciences, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Yongchuan, Chongqing 402160, China.
Erik BurchardU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.
Shiri FreilichInstitute of Plant Sciences, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, The Agricultural Research Organization, Ramat Yishay 30095, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5173-9695
Christopher DardickU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 2217 Wiltshire Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA.
Samir DrobyDepartment of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel.
Michael WisniewskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 220 Ag Quad Ln, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Agricultural Research Service · USAgricultural Research Organization · ILChongqing University of Arts and Sciences · CNStockholm University · SEUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2018-07366United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund IS-5040-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing recognition of the role that the microbiome plays in the health and physiology of many plant species. However, considerably less research has been conducted on the postharvest microbiome of produce and the impact that postharvest processing may have on its composition. Here, amplicon sequencing was used to study the effect of washing, waxing, and low-temperature storage at 2 °C for six months on the bacterial and fungal communities of apple calyx-end, stem-end, and peel tissues. The results of the present work reveal that tissue-type is the main factor defining fungal and bacterial diversity and community composition on apple fruit. Both postharvest treatments and low temperature storage had a strong impact on the fungal and bacterial diversity and community composition of these tissue types. Distinct spatial and temporal changes in the composition and diversity of the microbiota were observed in response to various postharvest management practices. The greatest impact was attributed to sanitation practices with major differences among unwashed, washed and washed-waxed apples. The magnitude of the differences, however, was tissue-specific, with the greatest impact occurring on peel tissues. Temporally, the largest shift occurred during the first two months of low-temperature storage, although fungi were more affected by storage time than bacteria. In general, fungi and bacteria were impacted equally by sanitation practices, especially the epiphytic microflora of peel tissues. This research provides a foundation for understanding the impact of postharvest management practices on the microbiome of apple and its potential subsequent effects on postharvest disease management and food safety.

Indexed as

carposphereEmpire applesfoodborne pathogensfruit microbiomeMalus domesticamicrobial compositionmicrobiotaplant microbiotapostharvest management

Identifiers

PMID32585961
PMCPMC7356622
OpenAlexW3036285063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.